The unique optical characteristics of lanthanide ions (Ln III ) have driven their use in a wide range of applications; however, the efficiency of populating their electronic states directly is limited, and thus there is a great need to create an antenna to capture energy and generate excited Ln III ions. In this context, metal-organic frameworks, hybrid materials, and nanoparticles randomly doped with homo-or heterometallic mixtures of luminescent lanthanide cations (Ln III ) are intensively being investigated for engineering luminescent devices for bright-white lighting, for upconversion, and as sensing agents. [1] Although the exact location of the various metals in the final material is crucial for dual ligand-centered/metalcentered emission, [1l,m] for upconversion, [1g] and for directional light-conversion [2a] processes, the preparation of organized polymetallic 4f-4f oligomers and polymers remains rare and challenging. [2] A statistical mechanics (Ising model) analysis suggests that standard repulsive nearest neighbor intermetallic interactions operating in linear polymers with regularly spaced binding sites should provide the targeted ordered …-Ln 1 -Ln 2 -Ln 1 -Ln 2 -… microstates. [3,4] Pioneering work in this field has relied on the bulk electropolymerization of didentate 1,10-phenanthroline with thienyl spacers, [5] and the acyclic diene metathesis of tridentate 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine, [6] followed by reaction with [Eu(b-diketonate) 3 ] or Eu(NO 3 ) 3 to yield red-emitting metallopolymers. A reliable exploitation of this concept for the development of luminescent materials, however, requires the efficient sensitization of the luminophore through the rational optimization of each photophysical step by using chemical tools.As a first step toward this goal, the rigid segmental ligand strands L1-L3, made of two tridentate binding units separated by a rigid and electronically tunable aromatic spacer, have been treated with trivalent europium to give the dinuclear complexes [Eu 2 (L)(hfac) 6 ] (Scheme 1; hfac = hexafluoroacetonato). [7] The use of a simple method for deciphering the various contributions to the sensitization mechanism clearly showed that [Eu 2 (L3)(hfac) 6 ] had the largest global emission quantum yield [F L Eu = 0.206(7), Eqs. (1) and (2)] because of an efficient L3!Eu energy transfer step [h L!Eu en:tr: = 0.47(14); Eq. (3), see the dark gray bars in Figure 1]. [7]