Nowadays, there is a great interest in the economic success
of direct-ethanol fuel cells; however, our atomistic understanding
of the designing of stable and low-cost catalysts for the steam reforming
of ethanol is still far from satisfactory, in particular due to the
large number of undesirable intermediates. In this study, we will
report a first-principles investigation of the adsorption properties
of ethanol and water at low coverage on close-packed transition-metal
(TM) surfaces, namely, Fe(110), Co(0001), Ni(111), Cu(111), Ru(0001),
Rh(111), Pd(111), Ag(111), Os(0001), Ir(111), Pt(111), and Au(111),
employing density functional theory (DFT) calculations. We employed
the generalized gradient approximation with the formulation proposed
by Perdew, Burke, and Erzenholf (PBE) to the exchange-correlation
functional and the empirical correction proposed by S. Grimme (DFT+D3)
for the van der Waals correction. We found that both adsorbates binds
preferentially near or on the on-top sites of the TM surfaces through
the O atoms. The PBE adsorption energies of ethanol and water decreases
almost linearly with the increased occupation of the 4d and 5dd-band, while there is a deviation for the 3d systems.
The van der Waals correction affects the linear behavior and increases
the adsorption energy for both adsorbates, which is expected as the
van der Waals energy due to the correlation effects is strongly underestimated
by DFT-PBE for weak interacting systems. The geometric parameters
for water/TM are not affected by the van der Waals correction, i.e.,
both DFT and DFT+D3 yield an almost parallel orientation for water
on the TM surfaces; however, DFT+D3 changes drastically the ethanol
orientation. For example, DFT yields an almost perpendicular orientation
of the C–C bond to the TM surface, while the C–C bond
is almost parallel to the surface using DFT+D3 for all systems, except
for ethanol/Fe(110). Thus, the van der Waals correction decreases
the distance of the C atoms to the TM surfaces, which might contribute
to break the C–C bond. The work function decreases upon the
adsorption of ethanol and water, and both follow the same trends,
however, with different magnitude (larger for ethanol/TM) due to the
weak binding of water to the surface. The electron density increases
mainly in the region between the topmost layer and the adsorbates,
which explains the reduction of the substrate work function.