1996
DOI: 10.1021/ar950219w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metallicity of Ultrathin Metal Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our Φ results are in a good agreement with previous theoretical and experimental results. , , For Ru(0001), Pd(111), Ag(111), Pt(111), and Au(111), the work function error is less than 1% compared with previous PBE results, ,, while for other systems the deviation is about 1.9–3.2%, , except for Co(0001), where we found a deviation of about 9.5% . In general, our results are smaller than the experimental values. , The smallest deviation (about 0.5%) is obtained for Pt(111), while for the remaining systems the deviation is about 3.5–6.6%, , which have been attributed to the large error bar among the experimental results …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our Φ results are in a good agreement with previous theoretical and experimental results. , , For Ru(0001), Pd(111), Ag(111), Pt(111), and Au(111), the work function error is less than 1% compared with previous PBE results, ,, while for other systems the deviation is about 1.9–3.2%, , except for Co(0001), where we found a deviation of about 9.5% . In general, our results are smaller than the experimental values. , The smallest deviation (about 0.5%) is obtained for Pt(111), while for the remaining systems the deviation is about 3.5–6.6%, , which have been attributed to the large error bar among the experimental results …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“… a Reference ; DFT-GGA result. b Reference ; DFT-PW91 result. c Reference ; experiment. d Reference ; experiment. e Reference ; DFT-GGA result. f Reference ; DFT-GGA result. g Reference ; DFT-GGA result. h Reference ; DFT-GGA result. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…⌽ Pd͑111͒ = 5.66, 5.25, and 5.31 eV for LDA, GGA-PBE, and GGA-PW91, respectively, while the experimental results are 5.44 eV, 59 5.55 eV, 60 and 5.95 eV. 2 The experimental and calculated results for ⌽ Pd͑111͒ are discussed in detail elsewhere.…”
Section: Work Function Change and Induced Surface Dipole Momentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement with experiment are satisfactory, taking into account the uncertainties in the measurements. [58][59][60][61][62][63]…”
Section: Clean Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%