2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metallic Intraocular Foreign Bodies: Characteristics, Interventions, and Prognostic Factors for Visual Outcome and Globe Survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
62
2
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
62
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal, obviously associated with hammering or Predictive factors and outcomes of IOFBs J Choovuthayakorn et al chiseling, was the most common nature of IOFBs, which is similar to other studies. [11][12][13] Interestingly, this study also revealed that the electric grass trimmer was the most common mechanism of injury. Poor presenting VA has previously been reported as an important predictive factor for poor visual outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metal, obviously associated with hammering or Predictive factors and outcomes of IOFBs J Choovuthayakorn et al chiseling, was the most common nature of IOFBs, which is similar to other studies. [11][12][13] Interestingly, this study also revealed that the electric grass trimmer was the most common mechanism of injury. Poor presenting VA has previously been reported as an important predictive factor for poor visual outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As our medical center is a tertiary referral center, the mean time of IOFBs removal in this study was 30.7 days (median 6 days), whereas the incidence of endophthalmitis was 9.1%, which is comparable to other studies; range 0-20%. [11][12][13]16 In a preceding report, certain different physical characteristics of magnetic and nonmagnetic IOFBs were associated with a higher rate of retinal break formation and subsequent RD, especially with glass IOFBs. 18 This study did not demonstrate a correlation between the nature of IOFBs and postoperative RD (Fisher exact test, P ¼ 1.000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Ocular reaction to FBs is variable depending on the size and composition, localization, degree of anterior and/or posterior segment penetration and mechanical irritation [4,[13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the nature of the FB, the presenting ophthalmic disease is highly variable, depending on the interval between trauma and presentation, degree of anterior and/or posterior segment penetration and retention, or loss of the FB [13][14][15][16]. Managing options depend on clinical presentation and range from conservative medical treatment to surgery to remove the FB and/or address concurrent ocular injuries [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In such cases, the ophthalmic examination should begin with the documentation of visual acuity, followed by a detailed examination of the orbit for periorbital and subconjunctival hemorrhage and proptosis. Extraocular movements and visual fields should be examined and a careful inspection of the globe should be performed to determine the presence or absence of perforation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%