2011
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MetalionRNA: computational predictor of metal-binding sites in RNA structures

Abstract: Motivation: Metal ions are essential for the folding of RNA molecules into stable tertiary structures and are often involved in the catalytic activity of ribozymes. However, the positions of metal ions in RNA 3D structures are difficult to determine experimentally. This motivated us to develop a computational predictor of metal ion sites for RNA structures.Results: We developed a statistical potential for predicting positions of metal ions (magnesium, sodium and potassium), based on the analysis of binding sit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, ions can bind to an RNA through site-specific and nonspecific associations (Cate and Doudna 1996;Draper et al 2005;Lipfert et al 2014;Petukh et al 2015). Site-specific association (binding) is often accompanied with full or partial dehydration of the ions, which are trapped at specific sites (Misra and Draper 2001;Philips et al 2012) such as specific pocket regions in the structure. The nonspecifically bound ions usually remain hydrated and form a mobile "ionic atmosphere" (Lipfert et al 2014) ("ionic cloud") (Kirmizialtin et al 2012) to cover the RNA to neutralize most charges in RNA (Bai et al 2007;Tan and Chen 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, ions can bind to an RNA through site-specific and nonspecific associations (Cate and Doudna 1996;Draper et al 2005;Lipfert et al 2014;Petukh et al 2015). Site-specific association (binding) is often accompanied with full or partial dehydration of the ions, which are trapped at specific sites (Misra and Draper 2001;Philips et al 2012) such as specific pocket regions in the structure. The nonspecifically bound ions usually remain hydrated and form a mobile "ionic atmosphere" (Lipfert et al 2014) ("ionic cloud") (Kirmizialtin et al 2012) to cover the RNA to neutralize most charges in RNA (Bai et al 2007;Tan and Chen 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a larger grid width of the cubic grid, the statistics would be biased by the cell boundaries, negatively affecting the prediction quality. For smaller cells, the computational power and time increase significantly, without noticeable influence on the accuracy of the results (for more details, see MetalionRNA original article (Philips et al, 2012)). However, MetalionRNA server offers a grid width of 0.25 Å to choose for analysis of a special purpose, but we do not recommend this for common practice.…”
Section: Running Metalionrna and Ligandrnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential is obtained using the inverse Boltzmann scheme, which presumes that only those ligand poses are favorable that exhibit interactions fitting the maxima of the statistical distribution of RNA-ligand atom contacts derived from experimentally determined structures of RNA-ligand complexes. We have used the same approach that we found successful in prediction of RNA-metal ion interactions with our method MetalionRNA (Philips et al 2012). First, we defined a list of RNA atom pairs [a, b] in nucleotides, of which b is an atom that may directly interact with a ligand, and a is covalently bound to b (Table 1).…”
Section: Statistical Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important advantage of using a grid is that the discretization of space obviates the need to solve the potential function analytically and allows mapping of the statistical data into well-defined portions of space. A grid-based approach has been successfully applied in our previous studies on RNA-metal ion interactions (Philips et al 2012) and in small molecule docking, e.g., in the AutoDock program (Morris et al 2009). …”
Section: Algorithm For Scoring Of Ligand Posesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation