2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2011.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metalinguistic knowledge and cognitive style in Polish classroom learners of English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the R&G taxonomy of learning difficulty seemingly did not prove useful in predicting learners' implicit or explicit knowledge of the targeted L2 grammar points. This differs somewhat from previous studies in which the same taxonomy was employed successfully to differentiate between higher and lower explicit learning difficulty (Thepseenu & Roehr, 2013;Ziętek & Roehr, 2011). It is not possible to conclude from the available evidence whether the proposed criteria for determining learning difficulty themselves were inadequate for the more detailed predictions of rank orders of learning difficulty and performance on measures of both implicit and explicit knowledge as required in the present study, or whether the small group of participating applied linguists (n=3) was unable to use the criteria accurately for these purposes.…”
Section: Difficulty Judgements Predicting Performancecontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the R&G taxonomy of learning difficulty seemingly did not prove useful in predicting learners' implicit or explicit knowledge of the targeted L2 grammar points. This differs somewhat from previous studies in which the same taxonomy was employed successfully to differentiate between higher and lower explicit learning difficulty (Thepseenu & Roehr, 2013;Ziętek & Roehr, 2011). It is not possible to conclude from the available evidence whether the proposed criteria for determining learning difficulty themselves were inadequate for the more detailed predictions of rank orders of learning difficulty and performance on measures of both implicit and explicit knowledge as required in the present study, or whether the small group of participating applied linguists (n=3) was unable to use the criteria accurately for these purposes.…”
Section: Difficulty Judgements Predicting Performancecontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…The methodological basis for the pedagogical experiment was the "inverted lesson" method (this is a teaching model in which the teacher provides material for self-study at home, while in-person training takes place in practice. Inverted education is characterized by the use of vodcast, podcast, and pre-vodcast) (Cheng, Huang & Lin, 2012;Ziętek & Roehr, 2011), the case study method with the preparation of individual and/or group reporting presentations (Siegle, 2010) and the portfolio method for monitoring and fair evaluation of student achievement (Oliynyk, 2004). Of the wide range of cloud technologies, we mainly used Moodle platform, Google Drive, Google Docs, Power Point and Google Image, Google Search and Skype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…''Metalinguistic awareness'' and ''metalinguistic knowledge'' are other terms which denote a similar meaning (Roehr and Gánem-Gutiérrez 2009;Ziętek and Roehr 2011). According to Renou (2001, p. 248), metalinguistic awareness is defined as ''conscious knowledge of the formal aspects of the target language (e.g.…”
Section: The Definition Of Language Awareness and Associated Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%