1999
DOI: 10.5117/9789053563410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metalinguistic Activity in Learning to Write

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
21

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
40
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical studies did in fact show the limitations of students being able to draw on their grammar knowledge in the context of writing (Camps, Guasch, Milian, & Ribas, 2000); they also showed the poorly-articulated grammar concepts of students (Notario, 2001). But since no suggestions as to how to overcome these problems were to be found in the dominant communicative approach, they simply remained ignored.…”
Section: Approaching the Process Of Grammar Learning: Raising Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Empirical studies did in fact show the limitations of students being able to draw on their grammar knowledge in the context of writing (Camps, Guasch, Milian, & Ribas, 2000); they also showed the poorly-articulated grammar concepts of students (Notario, 2001). But since no suggestions as to how to overcome these problems were to be found in the dominant communicative approach, they simply remained ignored.…”
Section: Approaching the Process Of Grammar Learning: Raising Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that grammar knowledge will not be a precondition for this activity of manipulation but its consequence. Indeed, Camps et al (2000) consider this activity as the permanent source of knowledge of language, "which contributes to build it and to activate it" (104). These works argue that interaction is a basic feature of this activity.…”
Section: Approaching the Process Of Grammar Learning: Raising Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In schools therefore, a model of grammar teaching should go beyond the general distinction between implicit and explicit grammar so frequently encountered in available pedagogic grammars. Building on the contributions of Culioli (1990) and Karmilof-Smith (1992), and on the results of research into metalinguistic activity in the writing composition processes (Camps and Milian 2000), we defend the need to establish different levels in which metalinguistic activity manifests itself. Recognising that there is an implicit metalinguistic or epilinguistic activity inherent to language use, we consider that there is a need in schools to focus on explicit metalinguistic activity, i.e.…”
Section: Metalinguistic Activity and Conceptualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the book edited by Camps and Milian (2000), several different issues are raised, and together these give us a broad view of metalinguistic activity. Some of the more relevant ones are: the role of metalinguistic reflection as a factor in developing writing competence in academic situations (Tolchinsky 2000;Castelló 2000), the influence of social and cultural factors concurring in writing activities (Pittard and Martlew 2000;Dolz and Erard 2000), the relationship between metacognition and metalinguistic activity (Castelló 2000;Rijlaarsdam and Couzin 2000;Allal 2000), and the analysis of metalinguistic activity in collaborative writing processes and the characterisation of the different levels in this activity .…”
Section: Metalinguistic Activity In Writing Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%