2013
DOI: 10.1021/bi400812r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Transfer within the Escherichia coli HypB–HypA Complex of Hydrogenase Accessory Proteins

Abstract: The maturation of [NiFe]-hydrogenase in E. coli is a complex process involving many steps and multiple accessory proteins. The two accessory proteins, HypA and HypB, interact with each other and are thought to cooperate to insert nickel into the active site of the hydrogenase-3 precursor protein. Both of these accessory proteins bind metal individually, but little is known about the metal-binding activities of the proteins once they assemble together into a functional complex. In this study, we investigate how… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
82
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(176 reference statements)
3
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that the difference in Ni(II) affinity between the GTP-and GDP-bound states could be further magnified due to other components of the hydrogenase pathway. In support of this model, E. coli HypA stimulates nickel release from the GDP-bound, but not the GTP-bound, HypB protein (61). This mechanism of action of HypB corresponds to recent observations made with UreG (62), a closely related GTPase required for urease maturation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We propose that the difference in Ni(II) affinity between the GTP-and GDP-bound states could be further magnified due to other components of the hydrogenase pathway. In support of this model, E. coli HypA stimulates nickel release from the GDP-bound, but not the GTP-bound, HypB protein (61). This mechanism of action of HypB corresponds to recent observations made with UreG (62), a closely related GTPase required for urease maturation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…HypB's interaction with the large subunit requires the presence of HypA, providing support for HypA being the docking protein between HypB and HycE in the nickel delivery step [210,219,220]. Moreover, HypA selectively removes Ni 2+ from the GTPase domain of HypB and this metal release appears to be stimulated by GTP hydrolysis [225]. Despite the observation that Ni 2+ binding to HypB partially inhibits the GTPase activity of HypB [217], it is presumed that complex formation in vivo alleviates this retardation and promotes nickel mobilization [225].…”
Section: Insertion Of Ni 2+ : Hypa and Hypbmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, HypA selectively removes Ni 2+ from the GTPase domain of HypB and this metal release appears to be stimulated by GTP hydrolysis [225]. Despite the observation that Ni 2+ binding to HypB partially inhibits the GTPase activity of HypB [217], it is presumed that complex formation in vivo alleviates this retardation and promotes nickel mobilization [225]. Along these lines, it has been demonstrated that in E. coli, SlyD delivers Ni 2+ to HypB and heterodimer formation between these proteins promotes GTP hydrolysis by HypB [226].…”
Section: Insertion Of Ni 2+ : Hypa and Hypbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HypF and HypE proteins deliver the CN − ligands, which are synthesized from carbamoyl phosphate (9). Incorporation of the nickel is facilitated by the HypB and HypA proteins (10). However, source and synthesis of the active site CO ligand remained elusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%