1999
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620181012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal toxicity in two rodent species and redox potential: Evaluation of quantitative structure—activity relationships

Abstract: A quantitative structure-activity relationship study of acute toxicity in the mouse and rat is described for the soluble salts of a relatively large number of metals (between 25 and 30 in total). Electrode potential is the major determinant of acute metal toxicity (R = 0.85 and 0.86) for an intraperitoneal dose in the mouse, whereas the addition of ionic radius and polarizability enables the inclusion of notable outliers in the original expression, such as beryllium and barium, thus giving a good correlation (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data sets reported effects of seven or more metals to a variety of organisms and endpoints including enzyme inactivation, cultured cell viability, germination inhibition of fungi, bioaccumulation in a marine diatom, inhibition of bacterial bioluminescence (Microtox ), acute toxicity to soil nematodes and an array of aquatic invertebrates, and chronic effects on lethal or sublethal endpoints. Recent work by other groups has used this approach with additional ion qualities and plant [9] or mammalian species [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data sets reported effects of seven or more metals to a variety of organisms and endpoints including enzyme inactivation, cultured cell viability, germination inhibition of fungi, bioaccumulation in a marine diatom, inhibition of bacterial bioluminescence (Microtox ), acute toxicity to soil nematodes and an array of aquatic invertebrates, and chronic effects on lethal or sublethal endpoints. Recent work by other groups has used this approach with additional ion qualities and plant [9] or mammalian species [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic Types of (Auto)catalytic Cyclic Processes a) Autocatalytic process order > exit order b) Autocatalytic process order = exit order c) Autocatalytic process order < exit order d) No autocatalysis, but heterocatalysis (applies to numerous geochemical background processes, e.g., [23] 30 , and e) Cross catalysis, including symbioses a) corresponds to a strong (current) cycle, b) to a critical cycle, and c) to a weak cycle; d) is also a weak cycle, but it cannot be dominated biologically since reproduction no longer plays any substantial role in a reproduction order of O ak ≈ 0; e) is a critical cycle by definition because of mutual dependence -and has unstable long-term kinetics 31 . The nature of the cycle may change through cross-connection of reaction loops among themselves, the addition of highly reactive antagonists, the polymerization of the autocatalyst and the like, but always in the direction of weaker autocatalysis [15].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case heterocatalysis takes place instead of (biotic or inorganic) autocatalysis. 31 Similarly, symbiotic systems such as lichens are particularly suitable for identifying interference such as the influence of environmental noxae [21].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has leaded some authors [11] to use in their papers the word beryllium for both species, a source of confusion. Studies on the toxicity of beryllium and on chronic beryllium disease, CBD, are very numerous and extend over 60 years [1,5,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17]. For many authors, beryllium is the most toxic non-radioactive element in the periodic table [18,19], but Buchner does not agree having stated that "the acute toxicity of beryllium ions does not exceed that of other toxic cations like Cd 2+ , Ba 2+ , Hg 2+ or As 3+ " [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%