2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-to-Insulating Transition in the Perovskite System YSr2Cu2FeO8−δ(0 < δ < 1) Modeled by DFT Methods

Abstract: Progress in the design of functional perovskite oxides relies on advances in density functional theory (DFT) methods to efficiently and effectively model complex systems composed of several transition-metal ions. This work reports the application of DFT methods to investigate the electronic structure of the YSr 2 Cu 2 FeO 8−δ (0 < δ < 1) family in which the insulating, metal, or superconducting behaviors and even anion conductivity can be tuned by modifying the oxygen content. In particular, we assess the perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Noteworthily, the inter-plane magnetic interactions are weak throughout the YSr 2 Cu 2 FeO 7+d system. 8,17,32,34 This is consistent with the small energy differences found between the inter-plane ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic couplings in YSr 2 Cu 2 FeO 7 within the PBE, PBE+U and SCAN approximations. 8 For this oxide, the SCAN+U (U Fe = U Cu = 4 eV) yields a negligible energy (E TotalFM -E TotalA-AFM ) difference of 0.004 eV per formula unit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…17 Noteworthily, the inter-plane magnetic interactions are weak throughout the YSr 2 Cu 2 FeO 7+d system. 8,17,32,34 This is consistent with the small energy differences found between the inter-plane ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic couplings in YSr 2 Cu 2 FeO 7 within the PBE, PBE+U and SCAN approximations. 8 For this oxide, the SCAN+U (U Fe = U Cu = 4 eV) yields a negligible energy (E TotalFM -E TotalA-AFM ) difference of 0.004 eV per formula unit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…8,17,32,34 This is consistent with the small energy differences found between the inter-plane ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic couplings in YSr 2 Cu 2 FeO 7 within the PBE, PBE+U and SCAN approximations. 8 For this oxide, the SCAN+U (U Fe = U Cu = 4 eV) yields a negligible energy (E TotalFM -E TotalA-AFM ) difference of 0.004 eV per formula unit. Similarly, for the metallic YSr 2 Cu 2 FeO 8 , the A-type AFM configuration is only 0.018 eV per formula unit more stable than the FM configuration within the SCAN +U (U Fe = U Cu = 4 eV).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations