2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal (Ti, Zr, Hf) insertion in the C–H bond of methane: Manifestation of an agostic interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large delocalization energy from the C-H1 bond to the Ti-H4 anti-bond with various levels of theory (6.94-38.19 kcal/ mol) is considered as the primary origin of the agostic interaction, being consistent with the recent results of Berkaine et al 4 Table 1 also shows that the larger agostic distortion is normally accompanied with a larger occupation number of σ* (Ti-H4) and electron delocalization energy. For example, the largest MP2 σ*(Ti-H4) occupation number of 0.091 and delocalization energy of 38.19 kcal/mol lead to the largest agostic angle of 78.5°.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The large delocalization energy from the C-H1 bond to the Ti-H4 anti-bond with various levels of theory (6.94-38.19 kcal/ mol) is considered as the primary origin of the agostic interaction, being consistent with the recent results of Berkaine et al 4 Table 1 also shows that the larger agostic distortion is normally accompanied with a larger occupation number of σ* (Ti-H4) and electron delocalization energy. For example, the largest MP2 σ*(Ti-H4) occupation number of 0.091 and delocalization energy of 38.19 kcal/mol lead to the largest agostic angle of 78.5°.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…In comparison with the previously reported values, 1-4 the HF methods evidently underestimates the agostic interaction, whereas the MP2 method overestimates. The increases in the B3LYP and BPW91 delocalization energies to σ*(Ti-H4) with the agostic distortion from the C s structures (10.59 and 11.18 kcal/mol with the 6-311++G(3df,3pd) basis set) are comparable to the previously estimated values, 3,4 whereas the increase in the CCSD value (20.8 kcal/mol) is somewhat too high.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations