2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6sc01039c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal sulfide ion exchangers: superior sorbents for the capture of toxic and nuclear waste-related metal ions

Abstract: Metal sulfide ion-exchangers (MSIEs) have emerged as a new class of promising sorbents for the removal of toxic and radioactive metals from wastewater.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
220
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
220
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, in simulated alkaline groundwater, the K d value could reach as high as 1.65×10 5 mL g −1 , and the Ni 2+ ion removal rate is close to 100 %. In general, a material with a K d value >10 4 mL g −1 is considered to be an excellent adsorbent . This demonstrated the suitability of 1 for the remediation of groundwater contaminated with Ni 2+ ion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly, in simulated alkaline groundwater, the K d value could reach as high as 1.65×10 5 mL g −1 , and the Ni 2+ ion removal rate is close to 100 %. In general, a material with a K d value >10 4 mL g −1 is considered to be an excellent adsorbent . This demonstrated the suitability of 1 for the remediation of groundwater contaminated with Ni 2+ ion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the treatment of toxic and nuclear‐waste‐related metal ions is a major concern for countries all over the world . Compared to hazardous radionuclides (e.g., Cs + , Sr 2+ ), however, the remediation of fission byproducts has not received considerable attention .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 2, high Hg II adsorption capacities of 900, 769 and 714 mg g À1 were obtainedf or BioMOF, [25] UiO-66-NHC(S)NHMe [26] and thiol-HKUST-1, [27] respectively.T hese values are well comparable to the results obtained from materials such as functional thiol mesoporouss ilica (635 mg g À1 ) [45] and modified covalent organic frameworks (COFs;7 34 mg g À1 for TAPB-BMTTPA-COF336). [46] Also, in comparison with other adsorbents, such as MSIEs (377 mg g À1 ), [47] resins (363 mg g À1 ), [48] and mesoporouss ilica (179 mg g À1 ), [49] the above-mentioned values are significantly higher. In spite of that, the other adsorbents exhibit highera dsorptionr ates (such as 1014mgg À1 for PAF-1-SH, [50] 1216 mg g À1 for POP-SH [51] and 1350 mg g À1 for post-synthetically modified), [52] preparation of COFs often require expensive ligands and PAF-SH-1 and POP-SH require multi-step reactions.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mof-based Materials and Other Adsorbents mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, the ionization energy of selenium is less than that of sulfur. This lead to a significant difference in the band gap between the metal selenide and the metal sulfide, so the metal selenide exhibits a different property than the metal sulfide . In recent years, some research groups have developed and designed metal (Ni, Co, Fe, Cu, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%