2012
DOI: 10.21236/ada562327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Residue Deposition from Military Pyrotechnic Devices and Field Sampling Guidance

Abstract: Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors found that in terms of metal input into the environment, there remains a limited number of extensive studies that pertain specifically to larger caliber artillery and mortar ranges in literature with the majority of studies focusing on energetic compounds from such activities (Brannon et al, 2000;Jenkins et al, 2001Jenkins et al, , 2006Pennington et al, 2008;Thiboutot et al, 2012). More recently, Clausen et al (2012) conducted a study of four Army pyrotechnic devices heavily used during range training to assess the metal deposition rate. The study concluded salts of Ba, Cu, Mn, K, and Sr were introduced into the environment.…”
Section: Small Arms Rangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found that in terms of metal input into the environment, there remains a limited number of extensive studies that pertain specifically to larger caliber artillery and mortar ranges in literature with the majority of studies focusing on energetic compounds from such activities (Brannon et al, 2000;Jenkins et al, 2001Jenkins et al, , 2006Pennington et al, 2008;Thiboutot et al, 2012). More recently, Clausen et al (2012) conducted a study of four Army pyrotechnic devices heavily used during range training to assess the metal deposition rate. The study concluded salts of Ba, Cu, Mn, K, and Sr were introduced into the environment.…”
Section: Small Arms Rangesmentioning
confidence: 99%