2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00152-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal removal from wastewater using peat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
295
1
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 550 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
295
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Adsorption is a widely used technique for the removal of low concentrations of heavy metals from water, and the effectiveness of various adsorbents has been demonstrated over many years in different water and wastewater applications (Babel and Kurniawan, 2003;Brown et al, 2001). Activated carbon (AC) is one of the most common industrial adsorbents used for mercury removal Kurniawan et al, 2006;), yet various studies have shown practical limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adsorption is a widely used technique for the removal of low concentrations of heavy metals from water, and the effectiveness of various adsorbents has been demonstrated over many years in different water and wastewater applications (Babel and Kurniawan, 2003;Brown et al, 2001). Activated carbon (AC) is one of the most common industrial adsorbents used for mercury removal Kurniawan et al, 2006;), yet various studies have shown practical limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in a welloperated system regeneration of the carbon may result in a loss of ~15% of the original material; this coupled with the use of complexing agents to improve performance can result in substantial waste generation (Babel and Kurniawan, 2003;. Fly ash , clay , zeolite ) and peat moss (Brown et al, 2001) have also been commonly used as adsorbents because their structure provides sufficient surface area for adsorption. In all cases, however, the presence of an ill-defined pore structure (Hahn et al, 1996;Yoshitake et al, 2002) has a hindering effect on diffusion, which may lead to a decrease in the adsorption rate and the available capacity (Hu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional methods for the removal of the heavy metal ions from wastewaters include chemical precipitation, electro flotation, ion exchange, reverse osmosis and adsorption onto activated carbon. These methods have been found to be limited, since they often involve high capital and operational costs, incomplete removal (Brown et al 2000), and may be associated with the generation of secondary waste which is again to be treated or to be safely disposed off (Chandra et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Cain et al, 2008;Oliveira et al, 2005;Orhan and Buyukgungor, 1993). Among these biomaterials, marine algae and peat moss have been studied extensively to remove heavy metals from contaminated effluents (Zümriye, 1997;Brown et al, 2000). However, besides a strong metallic affinity, the search for easily available sorbents has led to the investigation of materials of agricultural origin as potential metal sorbents Sheth and Soni, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%