1974
DOI: 10.1080/01614947408071858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Particle Size Determination of Supported Metal Catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although originally intended for 0.7 wt%, the actual metal loadings converted from Pt uptake varied moderately and have been listed in Table 3. Here it should be noted that XRD and chemisorption reveal volume (d v,XRD ) and surface (d s,chemi ) averaged particle sizes respectively [32]. These values were compared with the respective volume and surface averaged particle size obtained from STEM images.…”
Section: Characterization Of Reduced Pt/al-simentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although originally intended for 0.7 wt%, the actual metal loadings converted from Pt uptake varied moderately and have been listed in Table 3. Here it should be noted that XRD and chemisorption reveal volume (d v,XRD ) and surface (d s,chemi ) averaged particle sizes respectively [32]. These values were compared with the respective volume and surface averaged particle size obtained from STEM images.…”
Section: Characterization Of Reduced Pt/al-simentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A convenient measure of particle size is the dispersion (Boudart, 1969), defined as the ratio of two numbers: the number of surface metal atoms and the total number of metal atoms. Dispersion D may be obtained by selective chemisorption of a gas to titrate surface atoms of a given kind (Benson and Boudart, 1965;Whyte, 1973). Naturally, it is important, before classifying a reaction to be either structure insensitive or structure sensitive, that no artifacts such as metal support interactions, catalyst deactivation and poisoning, or transport effects play any role while determining the catalytic activity.…”
Section: Page 904mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal dispersions are then calculated by assuming a H* to surface‐metal (H:M s ) stoichiometry at saturation ( θ sat , often assumed to be unity), and particle sizes can be estimated from dispersion for a given particle shape (e.g., hemispherical, spherical). X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can confirm these particle size estimates; however, small metal particles (<1 nm in diameter) are difficult to observe in standard TEM instruments and their sizes are inaccurately estimated using XRD . For these highly dispersed noble metal catalysts, the most common estimate of their size is given by H 2 chemisorption, which requires an accurate estimate of saturation H* coverages during chemisorption experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%