2022
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202201550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal‐Organic Frameworks for Greenhouse Gas Applications

Abstract: Using petrol to supply energy for a car or burning coal to heat a building generates plenty of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor (H2O), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), ozone (O3), fluorinated gases. These up‐and‐coming metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) are structurally endowed with rigid inorganic nodes and versatile organic linkers, which have been extensively used in the GHG‐related applications to improve the lives and protect the environment. Porous MOF materials… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 307 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organic-inorganic hybrid materials have shown great potential in the capture of CO 2 . Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) in particular have shown great promise for DAC applications, even on a pilot plant scale with sorbent-adsorbent cycles. This is due to several factors, namely, attributed to their scaffold of metal nodes, ions, or cluster, interlinked by organic molecules which allows for interstitial voids within a crystalline framework, enabling a great variety of chemistry in the pores and channels . The exceptional porosity and surface area allow for a high-capacity capture of many gases (and greenhouse gases). The structural diversity of these framework materials also enables fine-tuning of pore size and apertures which, in turn, allows for design of selective gas capture materials .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic-inorganic hybrid materials have shown great potential in the capture of CO 2 . Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) in particular have shown great promise for DAC applications, even on a pilot plant scale with sorbent-adsorbent cycles. This is due to several factors, namely, attributed to their scaffold of metal nodes, ions, or cluster, interlinked by organic molecules which allows for interstitial voids within a crystalline framework, enabling a great variety of chemistry in the pores and channels . The exceptional porosity and surface area allow for a high-capacity capture of many gases (and greenhouse gases). The structural diversity of these framework materials also enables fine-tuning of pore size and apertures which, in turn, allows for design of selective gas capture materials .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) integrate the distinct features of inorganic fillers (molecular separation, stability, and superior gas transport) and polymers (processability and flexibility), which are thus recognized as a smart solution for the construction of high‐performance and stable gas‐separation membranes. [ 5 ] Metal‐organic framework (MOF) nanoparticles, endowed with narrow pore windows, designable structural features, and tunable chemical components, [ 6 ] are broadly employed as ideal fillers to boost the separation performance of MMMs via straightforward mixing of the synthesized MOF into polymer matrix. [ 7 ] Although promising for large‐scale manufacture, fabrication of defect‐free membranes, the key quality factor for precise separation, is still challenging due to the poor interfacial compatibility and nanoparticle aggregation problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of gas separation, carbon capture technologies can be classified into the following three types. [10][11][12] (1) Chemical or quasi-chemical absorption methods. [13][14][15][16] The alkanolamine process is used to selectively absorb CO 2 by forming an N-C bond between the amine and CO 2 to achieve chemical adsorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of gas separation, carbon capture technologies can be classified into the following three types 10–12 . (1) Chemical or quasi‐chemical absorption methods 13–16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%