2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5an00553a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–organic framework MIL-101(Cr) as a sorbent of porous membrane-protected micro-solid-phase extraction for the analysis of six phthalate esters from drinking water: a combination of experimental and computational study

Abstract: An attractive metal-organic framework (MOF) MIL-101(Cr) material was synthesized at the nanoscale and applied as a sorbent in the porous membrane-protected micro-solid-phase extraction (μ-SPE) device for the pre-concentration of phthalate esters (PAEs) in drinking water samples for the first time. Parameters influencing the extraction efficiency, such as the selection of sorbent materials, pH adjustment, the effect of salt, magnetic-stirring extraction time, the desorption solvent and the desorption time, were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in relative intensity between the low angle peaks (at less than 6 • 2θ ) and those at higher angle (greater than 8 • 2θ ) in the measured pattern compared to the simulated pattern is accounted for by the presence of solvent in the as-prepared sample; in contrast, the simulated pattern is for an idealised guest-free framework. These X-ray powder patterns are typical of MIL-101 samples reported in the literature [44][45][46]. There is also evidence in the PXRD for the presence of an impurity phase in the sample, which we identify below as being MIL-88B ( Figure 1) [47].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The differences in relative intensity between the low angle peaks (at less than 6 • 2θ ) and those at higher angle (greater than 8 • 2θ ) in the measured pattern compared to the simulated pattern is accounted for by the presence of solvent in the as-prepared sample; in contrast, the simulated pattern is for an idealised guest-free framework. These X-ray powder patterns are typical of MIL-101 samples reported in the literature [44][45][46]. There is also evidence in the PXRD for the presence of an impurity phase in the sample, which we identify below as being MIL-88B ( Figure 1) [47].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…21 MOFs are a new class of nanoporous materials consisting of metal ions or clusters coordinated to organic ligands, and they have attracted considerable attention in the adsorption and removal of organic pollutants due to their ultrahigh surface areas, ultrahigh porosity, and tunable pore size. [22][23][24] Among the thousands of MOFs that have been introduced so far, one of the most prominent materials is MIL-101 (Cr). 25 MIL-101 (Cr) has been utilized as an adsorbent due to it having certain attractive features, such as large pore size, ultrahigh surface area, excellent chemical stability, and low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Recent studies have tried to correlate the structure of MOFs with that of pollutants intended to be monitored, with the goal of targeting MOFs for selective monitoring. 9,17,18 Such studies pointed out the difficulties in predicting the adsorption of a target analyte (for analytes initially present in a water media) into a specic MOF material. In any case, the MOF's exibility, the presence of unsaturated metal sites, large pore volumes, and a hydrophobic environment around the pores seem to be adequate characteristics when intending a MOF as generic sorbent for environmental monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%