The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40242-021-1317-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-Organic framework-based Wood Aerogel for Effective Removal of Micro/Nano plastics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another concern is the crystalline and delicate character of the MOFs, which can quickly break down into tiny powders, limiting their practical applicability. [ 138 ] In Table 2 , the microplastic photodegradation efficiencies of some of the metal oxide‐based photocatalysts are compared.…”
Section: Strategies Adopted For Microplastic Degradation Using Nano/m...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another concern is the crystalline and delicate character of the MOFs, which can quickly break down into tiny powders, limiting their practical applicability. [ 138 ] In Table 2 , the microplastic photodegradation efficiencies of some of the metal oxide‐based photocatalysts are compared.…”
Section: Strategies Adopted For Microplastic Degradation Using Nano/m...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…You et al [81] used MOF-based wood aerogel for removing micro/nano plastics. The results of the study indicate that ZIF-8@Aerogel has a highly favorable effect on the removal of nano-scale PVDF and PS particles.…”
Section: Application Of Mofs For Removal Of Mps From Water and Wastew...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A zinc MOF composite, ZIF-8@Aerogel, was reported by You et al in 2021 [ 59 ]. This material was prepared by growing in situ ZIF-8 particles on wood aerogel fibres and it was effectively applied for the removal of MPs/NPs at different concentration in water and seawater media.…”
Section: Mofs As Mps/nps Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Entry MOF or MOF-based composite MPs/NPs Application Conditions Process efficiency Ref. 1 ZIF-67 PS (1–3 µm) Adsorbent 5 ppb of MPs in water at a 3–12 pH range, 288–308 K Up to 92.1% of removal at 298 K [ 56 ] 2 MIL-101(Cr) PS (65 nm) Adsorbent 5–100 ppm of NPs in MiliQ water at pH 5–10, 25°C Up to 96% of removal at 5 and 70 ppm, pH 5 [ 57 ] 3 UiO-66-X in a melamine porous foam, X = H, NH 2 , OH, Br and NO 2 PVDF 260–322 nm PMMA 325 nm PS 183 nm Adsorbent 0.5–2 ppm of MPs in water/ethanol (3:1) or simulated seawater environments PMMA, 88.2% PS 85.7% PVDF Up to 95.5% of removal [ 58 ] 4 ZIF-8 in a wood aerogel PVDF (60—110 nm) PS (90―140 nm) Adsorbent 0.5 ppm of MPs in water/ethanol (3:1) and seawater environments Up to 91.4% of removal [ 59 ] 5 PSF/MIL-100 (Fe) mixed matrix membrane PVC (134.6 µm) PE (42.5 µm) Adsorbent Different concentrations of MPs/Nps in water at different pHand in presence of MB Up to 99% of removal [ 60 ] 6 UiO-66(Zr) PET chips Catalytic degradation Solvent-free p...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%