2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal mining and natural protected areas in Mexico: Geographic overlaps and environmental implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons governments may consider mineral extraction illegal include the contractual status of the workforce, the existence of ties to drug or human trafficking, and their location in protected areas (Buxton, 2013; Zabyelina & van Uhm, 2020), which, in principle, renders these activities unviable for legalization. The line between formality and informality is hard to draw (Mosquera, 2006), since even concessions for industrial mining often operate in gray legal spaces, for example, when they overlap with protected areas (Armendariz‐Villegas et al, 2015) or encroach onto them, or resort to informal labor to outsource part of their activities (Geenen & Verbrugge, 2020). Definitions of what is illegal vary across countries.…”
Section: Results: Interorganizational Coordination Policy Game Dynamics and Policy Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons governments may consider mineral extraction illegal include the contractual status of the workforce, the existence of ties to drug or human trafficking, and their location in protected areas (Buxton, 2013; Zabyelina & van Uhm, 2020), which, in principle, renders these activities unviable for legalization. The line between formality and informality is hard to draw (Mosquera, 2006), since even concessions for industrial mining often operate in gray legal spaces, for example, when they overlap with protected areas (Armendariz‐Villegas et al, 2015) or encroach onto them, or resort to informal labor to outsource part of their activities (Geenen & Verbrugge, 2020). Definitions of what is illegal vary across countries.…”
Section: Results: Interorganizational Coordination Policy Game Dynamics and Policy Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed the predominant impact of back contact for mineral and fossil depletion, human toxicity non-cancer and ecotoxicity. Back contact was made of gold, whose extraction procedure releases many toxic chemicals to the environment (cyanide and mercury, among others) and consumes many natural resources [57][58][59]. In scenario 3, the impact reductions were significant as a consequence of its reuse and recycling.…”
Section: Impact Categories Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mexico is the second most populated country in Latin America 9 and one of the world s most biodiverse countries 10 . However, Mexico faces several serious pollution challenges from anthropogenic activities such as mining and agriculture, which affect biodiversity and ecosystems 11,12 . The country is the largest producer of silver in the world and a major global producer of gold, copper, and zinc, amongst other minerals 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%