2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7nj01941f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal ions as external stimuli in stereoselective self-sorting of koneramines and thiokoneramines

Abstract: Stereoselective self-sorting of koneramines and thiokoneramines, which are N3 ligands, evolved from the system of pyridine-2-carboxaldehyde, mono-N-substituted ethylenediamine, primary alcohol or thiol, is observed when metal ions such as Ni(ii), Cu(ii), Zn(ii) and Cd(ii) are added as external stimuli to isolate the emergent molecule.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial characterization of the reaction mixture by using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry exhibited the presence of [Cu(L Ph O i Pr)Cl] + monocations as the most abundant species (observed m / z =472.1055, Figure S1 in the Supporting Information; calculated m / z =472.1091, Figure S2 in the Supporting Information), which suggested the formation of [Cu(L Ph O i Pr)Cl 2 ]. As none of the efforts in crystallizing [Cu(L Ph O i Pr)Cl 2 ] were fruitful, the chloride anions were exchanged to tosylate by using two equivalents of AgOTs (Figures S3, S4 in the Supporting Information); single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis (SCXRD) revealed the structure as syn ‐[Cu(L Ph O i Pr)(OTs) 2 (H 2 O)], which was expected . Previous reactions towards Cu‐koneramines also always selectively yielded racemic mixtures of syn (6 R ,7 R and 6 S ,7 S ) forms (Figure ); anti (6 R ,7 S and 6 S ,7 R ) forms of Cu‐koneramines have never been observed .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The initial characterization of the reaction mixture by using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry exhibited the presence of [Cu(L Ph O i Pr)Cl] + monocations as the most abundant species (observed m / z =472.1055, Figure S1 in the Supporting Information; calculated m / z =472.1091, Figure S2 in the Supporting Information), which suggested the formation of [Cu(L Ph O i Pr)Cl 2 ]. As none of the efforts in crystallizing [Cu(L Ph O i Pr)Cl 2 ] were fruitful, the chloride anions were exchanged to tosylate by using two equivalents of AgOTs (Figures S3, S4 in the Supporting Information); single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis (SCXRD) revealed the structure as syn ‐[Cu(L Ph O i Pr)(OTs) 2 (H 2 O)], which was expected . Previous reactions towards Cu‐koneramines also always selectively yielded racemic mixtures of syn (6 R ,7 R and 6 S ,7 S ) forms (Figure ); anti (6 R ,7 S and 6 S ,7 R ) forms of Cu‐koneramines have never been observed .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The koneramine complexes syn ‐[Cu(L Ph OMe)Cl 2 ], syn ‐[Zn(L Ph OMe)Cl 2 ], anti ‐[Ni(L Ph OMe)(H 2 O)Cl 2 ], and anti ‐[Cd(L Ph OMe)(μ‐Cl)Cl] 2 were isolated when methanol was used as the solvent, where methanol easily attacked the iminium ion 10 . We have equilibrated a mixture of an equivalent of N ‐phenylethylenediamine and two equivalents of pyridine‐2‐carboxaldehyde in isopropanol (Scheme ) . The Cu‐koneramine complex formation at the conditions reported by us recently was performed by adding an equivalent of copper(II) salt as an isopropanol solution .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations