2000
DOI: 10.1006/spmi.2000.0832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–insulator transition in quantum dot arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we only show results for two specific cases here, we emphasize that similar behaviour is found in temperature-dependent studies of other local conductance maxima or minima [42]. We find the amplitude of the logarithmic term to be quite similar in both the metallic and insulating states, and to be largely insensitive to the application of a magnetic field [43]. We also find that the magnitude of this term is larger in arrays of smaller dots and that no evidence for this term is present in measurements performed with the gates of the arrays grounded [43].…”
Section: 'Metal-insulator' Transition In Quantum Dot Arrayssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While we only show results for two specific cases here, we emphasize that similar behaviour is found in temperature-dependent studies of other local conductance maxima or minima [42]. We find the amplitude of the logarithmic term to be quite similar in both the metallic and insulating states, and to be largely insensitive to the application of a magnetic field [43]. We also find that the magnitude of this term is larger in arrays of smaller dots and that no evidence for this term is present in measurements performed with the gates of the arrays grounded [43].…”
Section: 'Metal-insulator' Transition In Quantum Dot Arrayssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We also find that the magnitude of this term is larger in arrays of smaller dots and that no evidence for this term is present in measurements performed with the gates of the arrays grounded [43]. For these reasons, we have suggested that the logarithmic term results from a confinement-induced enhancement of electron-electron interactions in the arrays [42,43]. While theoretical studies are called for to clarify the origin of this unexpected logarithmic variation, the interesting possibility is that this term provides a novel signature of electroninteraction effects in confined nanostructure devices.…”
Section: 'Metal-insulator' Transition In Quantum Dot Arraysmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation