2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–insulator transition in a layer adsorbed on a metal electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This motivates us to model electron transfer reaction through metallic adlayer, with adsorbate coverage varying between zero (lone adsorbate) and one. An important distinction between a metallic and non-metallic adlayer arises due to the electronic coupling between the adjacent adsorbed atoms in the former case, which leads to a two-dimensional bond formation in the adlayer at high coverages [18,17]. Thus in the monolayer regime, the conventional picture of the electron transfer through a single, localized bridge electronic state, does not hold true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This motivates us to model electron transfer reaction through metallic adlayer, with adsorbate coverage varying between zero (lone adsorbate) and one. An important distinction between a metallic and non-metallic adlayer arises due to the electronic coupling between the adjacent adsorbed atoms in the former case, which leads to a two-dimensional bond formation in the adlayer at high coverages [18,17]. Thus in the monolayer regime, the conventional picture of the electron transfer through a single, localized bridge electronic state, does not hold true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in the monolayer regime, one obtains extended electron states in the adlayer. These states now form a two-dimensional band [11,12]. The localized adsorbate states interact strongly with the solvent polarization modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%