2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03410-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal cutting simulations using smoothed particle hydrodynamics on the GPU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in which k is the heat conductivity assuming an isotropic heat conduction, c p the specific isobaric heat capacity, including the source terms Q plast and Q fric due to the conversion of the plastic and frictional work. According to the works in [17,23], these heat sources are computed from…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…in which k is the heat conductivity assuming an isotropic heat conduction, c p the specific isobaric heat capacity, including the source terms Q plast and Q fric due to the conversion of the plastic and frictional work. According to the works in [17,23], these heat sources are computed from…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 5, the values of five JC parameters (A, B, C, m, and n) will be provided for the titanium alloy under consideration. For friction modeling, Coulomb's law with a constant coefficient of µ = 0.35 is considered as a typical choice in LS-DYNA [13] and other SPH cutting models like [17], unless otherwise mentioned. As the magnitude of µ has a significant impact on the force prediction of numerical cutting models (see in [19,26] for more details), a sensitivity analysis will be presented to provide further insights into the influence of the friction coefficient on simulation results.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The methods supported by a mesh include the Multi-material Eulerian Method (MMEM) [13,14], the Volume of Solid (VOS) [15], and the Material Point Method (MPM) or Point in Cell (PiC) method [16,17]. Among the particles/meshless methods applied to metal cutting we found: the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) [18,19], the Finite Point Method (FPM) [20], the Constrained Natural Element Method (CNEM) [21], the Discrete Element Method (DEM) [22], the Maximum Entropy MeshFree method [23], the stabilized optimal transportation meshfree method (OTM) [24], and the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) [25][26][27][28]. Most of these new methods are applied using similar simplified models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%