2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-009-0538-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal contamination in urban park soils of São Paulo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…No correlation has been obtained for the As and Sb content in the soil and respectively in the plants with the pH of the soil. (Hammel et al, 2000) Max 500 0.09-2.2 Poland (metallurgical site) (Gal et al, 2006) 3.13-9.16 Spain (mining site) (Casado et al, 2007) 42-4530 0.02-2.77 60-230 0.002-4.25 Scotland (mining site) (Gal et al, 2006) 17.4-50 1.19-10 Italy (mining site) (Gal et al, 2006) 16-691 1.63-11.44 Bulgaria (reference soil) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) 1.25-2.32 England (reference soil) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) 0.29-1.3 Norway (reference soil) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) 0.17-2.2 China (metallurgical site) (He, 2007) 100.6-5045 Australia (mining site) (Sultan, 2007) 7.44-395.8 New Jersey (chemical pesticides with As) (Cheng et al, 2007) 3.8-387 New Jersey (reference soil) (Cheng et al, 2007) 1.6-4.6 Canada (reference soil) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) 0.05-2.0 Brasilia (in park) (Figueiredo et al, 2007) 11.5-21.5 1.4-2.5 Mexico (mining site) (Rosas et al, 1999) Max 30 The results show the existence of a correlation between the As and Sb contents in the soil and respectively in the plants, taking us to the presumption that these elements follow a common cycle between the polluting source, soil and plant. It is generally accepted that in the process of the absorption of metals from the soil by plants the dominant factor is the metal content from the soil, but in the same time it can be affected by other factors as well including the pH of the soil (Jung and Thorntorn, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No correlation has been obtained for the As and Sb content in the soil and respectively in the plants with the pH of the soil. (Hammel et al, 2000) Max 500 0.09-2.2 Poland (metallurgical site) (Gal et al, 2006) 3.13-9.16 Spain (mining site) (Casado et al, 2007) 42-4530 0.02-2.77 60-230 0.002-4.25 Scotland (mining site) (Gal et al, 2006) 17.4-50 1.19-10 Italy (mining site) (Gal et al, 2006) 16-691 1.63-11.44 Bulgaria (reference soil) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) 1.25-2.32 England (reference soil) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) 0.29-1.3 Norway (reference soil) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) 0.17-2.2 China (metallurgical site) (He, 2007) 100.6-5045 Australia (mining site) (Sultan, 2007) 7.44-395.8 New Jersey (chemical pesticides with As) (Cheng et al, 2007) 3.8-387 New Jersey (reference soil) (Cheng et al, 2007) 1.6-4.6 Canada (reference soil) (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001) 0.05-2.0 Brasilia (in park) (Figueiredo et al, 2007) 11.5-21.5 1.4-2.5 Mexico (mining site) (Rosas et al, 1999) Max 30 The results show the existence of a correlation between the As and Sb contents in the soil and respectively in the plants, taking us to the presumption that these elements follow a common cycle between the polluting source, soil and plant. It is generally accepted that in the process of the absorption of metals from the soil by plants the dominant factor is the metal content from the soil, but in the same time it can be affected by other factors as well including the pH of the soil (Jung and Thorntorn, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil metal pollution in parks and playgrounds has received wide interest and recent studies suggest that pollution and children's exposure to metals in these areas are of high concern [1][2][3][4][5]. Soil metal pollution may originate from different sources such as high background soil concentrations [6], industry [7], traffic [8] or treated wood structures [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(GLASCOCK, 2010) 27 A aplicação mundial da NAA é tão difundida que se estima aproximadamente 100.000 amostras submetidas à análise a cada ano (GLASCOCK, 2010). Esta técnica vem sendo largamente utilizada para a análises de solos e sedimentos (REZAEE et al, 2010;CRISTACHE et al, 2009;LLOYD et al, 2005;AL-JUNDI & RANDLE, 2001;DINESCU et al, 1998), e no Brasil essa técnica vem sendo utilizada em diferentes estudos e regiões pelo grupo de pesquisadores do Laboratório de Ativação Neutrônica (LAN) do IPEN/CNEN-SP (AMORIM et al, 2007(AMORIM et al, , 2008(AMORIM et al, , 2009 FÁVARO et al, 2000;FIGUEIREDO et al, 2009;LARIZZATTI et al, 2001). …”
Section: Análise Por Ativação Com Nêutrons (Naa)unclassified