1972
DOI: 10.1016/0073-8085(72)80013-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal complexes of sulphur-containing amino acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When GSH was included as a reductant, however, no damage could be detected. The reason for the superiority of cysteine over GSH is unclear but may derive from the ability of cysteine to form complexes with iron (31). In fact, the rate of iron reduction was not proportionate to cysteine concentration (data not shown), arguing against a simple rate-limiting electron transfer between cysteine and iron (see Discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When GSH was included as a reductant, however, no damage could be detected. The reason for the superiority of cysteine over GSH is unclear but may derive from the ability of cysteine to form complexes with iron (31). In fact, the rate of iron reduction was not proportionate to cysteine concentration (data not shown), arguing against a simple rate-limiting electron transfer between cysteine and iron (see Discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It has been proposed that ferric iron might coordinate with the sulfhydryl and carboxylate groups of cysteine (50). McAuliffe and Murray suggested that the interaction of sulfur, iron, and oxygen atoms in a three-center system would promote facile electron transfer (31). The additional carboxylate group of GSH might disturb this geometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XRD data for Ca-and Na-rich smectites suggest that cysteine is sorbed mostly on the external particle surface, whereas the amino acid is strongly retained in the interlayer by Cu-rich smectites. The increase in the d(001)-value may indicate the formation of a Cu-cysteine-complex in the interlayer sites (McAuliffe and Murray, 1972). Transition metal complexes of cysteine derivatives possessing monodentate coordination of the ligand through sulfur, bidentate coordination through sulfur and nitrogen (or oxygen), or tridentate coordination with sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms were previously studied (Aizawa et al, 1988).…”
Section: Na- Ca- and Cu-rich Smectite-cysteine Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McAuliffe and Murray, 1972) have shown that in soluble ferric-cysteine complexes formed in alkaline media, the ligand coordinates to Fe via S-and CO0-groups, forming bidentate chelates; these groups should participate during cysteine adsorption on noncrystalline iron(III) hydroxide. Cysteine can, therefore, behave like other multi-dentate ligands (e.g., citrate, silicate, and maltose; Cornell, 1987), which at ratios ofL:Fe = 0.1 strongly retard the transformation of noncrystalline iron(III) hydroxide and, in addition, suppress the formation of goethite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%