2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2930302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Artifact Reduction for X-Ray Computed Tomography Using U-Net in Image Domain

Abstract: Metal artifacts seriously degrade the quality of the CT data and bring great difficulties to subsequent image processing and analysis, which nowadays become a great concern in X-ray CT applications. In this paper, we introduce a U-net-based metal artifact reduction method into CT image domain. The proposed network reduces metal artifacts by learning an end-to-end mapping of images from metal-corrupted CT images to their corresponding artifact-free ground truth images. We design and optimize the network through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing deep MAR methods are mostly based on supervised learning, which requires the pairs of artefact-affected data and metal-free label for training, thus a distance function between network outputs and corresponding labels can be minimized. These supervised MAR methods can be divided into three categories: image-domain [3][4][5][6][7][8], sinogramdomain [9][10][11], and dual-domain [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Image domain supervised MAR methods work purely on reconstructed images and adopt techniques including residual learning [4,7], advanced network designs [5,6] like U-Net [18] and conditional GAN [19] to improve the performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing deep MAR methods are mostly based on supervised learning, which requires the pairs of artefact-affected data and metal-free label for training, thus a distance function between network outputs and corresponding labels can be minimized. These supervised MAR methods can be divided into three categories: image-domain [3][4][5][6][7][8], sinogramdomain [9][10][11], and dual-domain [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Image domain supervised MAR methods work purely on reconstructed images and adopt techniques including residual learning [4,7], advanced network designs [5,6] like U-Net [18] and conditional GAN [19] to improve the performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These supervised MAR methods can be divided into three categories: image-domain [3][4][5][6][7][8], sinogramdomain [9][10][11], and dual-domain [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Image domain supervised MAR methods work purely on reconstructed images and adopt techniques including residual learning [4,7], advanced network designs [5,6] like U-Net [18] and conditional GAN [19] to improve the performance. Sinogram-domain deep MAR methods learn to reduce artefacts by processing the projections, where the corrupted signals inside metal traces are rectified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21], a review was provided for the state-of-art technologies in metal artifact reduction, and the limitations of these technologies were also pointed out. Most recently, machine leaning methods are explored to battle the metal artifacts in CT [22][23][24][25]. In ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second category [21][22][23][24][25], the beam hardening effects are "learned" from a large set of measurements with and without metals. The learned model is automatically achieved after the training phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation