1959
DOI: 10.1002/9780470166024.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal‐Ammonia Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 128 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because the reactions are heterogeneous, variabilities in the quality and area of the metal surface often render these processes unpredictable and facetious in nature, especially on routine laboratory scales. , Historically, reaction development in this field has relied on activating the metal by mechanically reducing the size of the metal particle and by adding chemical activators such as iodine to clean the metal surface. , In the 1970s, Rieke pioneered an elegant solution to these practical problems of efficiency and generality for several alkaline earth and transition metals such as magnesium, zinc, and copper by developing a method that allowed access to highly reactive metal powders via the reduction of metal salts with alkali metals (Figure C). , Beyond the obvious synthetic utility of preparing reactive metals freshly, Rieke’s method was practical and straightforward, making it an instant success among the chemistry community. Unfortunately, Li-metal bears the lowest reduction potential among the elements and therefore cannot be prepared using Rieke’s method. As a departure from the current synthetic logic of mechanically pulverizing known Li-metal sources into reactive powders, we sought a new chemical approach which would allow for distinctive Li-metal sources to be practically prepared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the reactions are heterogeneous, variabilities in the quality and area of the metal surface often render these processes unpredictable and facetious in nature, especially on routine laboratory scales. , Historically, reaction development in this field has relied on activating the metal by mechanically reducing the size of the metal particle and by adding chemical activators such as iodine to clean the metal surface. , In the 1970s, Rieke pioneered an elegant solution to these practical problems of efficiency and generality for several alkaline earth and transition metals such as magnesium, zinc, and copper by developing a method that allowed access to highly reactive metal powders via the reduction of metal salts with alkali metals (Figure C). , Beyond the obvious synthetic utility of preparing reactive metals freshly, Rieke’s method was practical and straightforward, making it an instant success among the chemistry community. Unfortunately, Li-metal bears the lowest reduction potential among the elements and therefore cannot be prepared using Rieke’s method. As a departure from the current synthetic logic of mechanically pulverizing known Li-metal sources into reactive powders, we sought a new chemical approach which would allow for distinctive Li-metal sources to be practically prepared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%