2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaheuristic algorithms for PID controller parameters tuning: review, approaches and open problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 379 publications
(292 reference statements)
0
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrement of the predictive error through the optimization process provides the PI control gains that fulfill the regulation task in the prediction time horizon. At the end of this stage, the optimum controller parameter vector K * ( tl ) is set to the control system in (12) for the velocity regulation of the actual BLDC motor in the next time interval [ tl − tl +1 ].…”
Section: Predictive Stage In the Bldc Motormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The decrement of the predictive error through the optimization process provides the PI control gains that fulfill the regulation task in the prediction time horizon. At the end of this stage, the optimum controller parameter vector K * ( tl ) is set to the control system in (12) for the velocity regulation of the actual BLDC motor in the next time interval [ tl − tl +1 ].…”
Section: Predictive Stage In the Bldc Motormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency in the regulation and tracking performance of BLDC motors depends on two main aspects, the controller design [8,11] and the controller tuning process [12][13][14][15]. Several PID-like controllers and advanced control strategies have been adopted to address the first aspect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The major problems associated with ANN include the lengthy and time-consuming training process, while in the FL system, the generation of fuzzy membership functions depends on the proper tuning of the model, data analysis, and knowledge of the operator [8]. To avoid the stated issues, in recent years, researchers have employed recently introduced AI-based optimization techniques to achieve the optimal combination of PID controller gains in AVR systems, among which PSO is an extensively used algorithm owing to its smooth optimization process and simple implementation procedure, as can be seen in references [9][10][11][12]. However, it suffers from a few major drawbacks such as slow convergence in the optimization process, stagnation in the local optima, uncertainty in its parameter selection, and sub-optimal response in some of the very familiar benchmark functions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%