2009
DOI: 10.1080/13549830802693086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metagovernance of the national park process in Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale for meta-governance is neither explicitly mentioned, nor could it be easily inferred from the text, in almost half of the articles (n = 38/79, see Table 1). For the remaining 41 articles in which one or more reasons for meta-governance were identified, these rationales were not the main focus of study, except for Lund (2009). Clearly, little attention is paid in case studies to the why of meta-governance.…”
Section: The Why Of Meta-governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rationale for meta-governance is neither explicitly mentioned, nor could it be easily inferred from the text, in almost half of the articles (n = 38/79, see Table 1). For the remaining 41 articles in which one or more reasons for meta-governance were identified, these rationales were not the main focus of study, except for Lund (2009). Clearly, little attention is paid in case studies to the why of meta-governance.…”
Section: The Why Of Meta-governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authority instruments are used most frequently (n = 41/79), followed by informational instruments (n = 35/79) and economic instruments (n = 33/79). Authority instruments covered in the literature range from strict mandates and task descriptions for governance networks (See for example Damgaard and Torfing 2010;Haveri et al 2009;Lund 2009), to broader overall visions including political priorities and guiding core principles (e.g. Hansson 2013;Sehested 2009;Voets, Verhoest, and Molenveld 2015).…”
Section: The How Of Meta-governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the UK context, policy-makers and scholars acknowledged the rise of challenges of effective policy-making as result of the so-called 'third way' and the subsequent devolution of legislative power to regional and metropolitan authorities (Allmendinger & Haughton, 2009;Heley, 2013;Heley & Moles, 2012;Tewdwr-Jones, 2012). In Denmark Lund (2009), demonstrated how metagovernance modes for effective environmental conservation and stakeholder participation were hindered by the pressure of national bodies and of conservation authorities in particular. Outside the EU, interest in metagovernance has also focussed on regional environmental issues.…”
Section: <Insert Table 1 About Here>mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, society-centric frames see metagovernance as a way to maintain democratic accountability within governance networks (Sørensen and Torfing 2005). These perspectives are united by the common 205 assertion that metagovernance does not replace governance, but rather is an effort to balance and coordinate it (Lund 2009). …”
Section: Metagovernancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metagovernance activities include: the 'steering', rather than implementing, of network processes (Meuleman 2006, Lund 2009); design of institutions; and some authors include value management or discursive framing as a higher order of metagovernance (Sørensen 2006, Kooiman andJentoft 2009).…”
Section: Metagovernancementioning
confidence: 99%