2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metagenomic survey of bacterial diversity in the atmosphere of Mexico City using different sampling methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S2a-b. These genera can be also found within the most abundant taxa in other studies on very different urban areas[41,[69][70][71].…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…S2a-b. These genera can be also found within the most abundant taxa in other studies on very different urban areas[41,[69][70][71].…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…415 Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, which are the most common phyla found in 416 soil(Delgado-Baquerizo et al, 2018), such as Sphingomonas, Kocuria, Pseudomonas 417 and Paracoccus Figure 1c-d and Figure S4a-b. These genera can be also found within 418the most abundant taxa in other studies on very different urban areas(Li et al, 2019; 419 Polymenakou et al, 2020;Serrano-Silva and Calderon-Ezquerro, 2018; Yan et al, 420 2018a).…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In this study, alpha diversity analysis also included unidentified OTUs by 97% sequence identity because unidentified OTU should be counted for diversity. OTUs with less than 10 sequences were discarded due to the possibility of error like many previous studies [29, 30]. Chao1 values could be changed whether low-abundance read is included in analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%