2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.12.945139
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metagenomic analysis of the cow, sheep, reindeer and red deer rumen

Abstract: The rumen microbiota comprises a community of microorganisms which specialise in the degradation of complex carbohydrates from plant-based feed. These microbes play a highly important role in ruminant nutrition and could also act as sources of industrially useful enzymes. In this study, we performed a metagenomic analysis of samples taken from the ruminal contents of cattle (Bos Taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and red deer (Cervus elaphus). We constructed 391 metagenome-assembled geno… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peng et al 1 and Gharechahi et al 2 both recently published hundreds of rumen-derived MAGs, and compared them to 4941 rumen MAGs from Stewart et al 3 , and a previously published culture collection 4 . However, many more rumen-derived MAGs are publicly available, including 15 MAGs released by Hess et al 5 , 79 from Solden et al 6 , 99 from Svartstrom et al 7 , 251 from Parks et al 8 (which analysed rumen data from Wallace et al 9 and Shi et al 10 ), 1200 from Wilkinson et al 11 , 4199 released by Glendinning et al 12 (391 of which were the subject of the publication), and 20469 released by Stewart et al 3 (4941 of which were the subject of the publication).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al 1 and Gharechahi et al 2 both recently published hundreds of rumen-derived MAGs, and compared them to 4941 rumen MAGs from Stewart et al 3 , and a previously published culture collection 4 . However, many more rumen-derived MAGs are publicly available, including 15 MAGs released by Hess et al 5 , 79 from Solden et al 6 , 99 from Svartstrom et al 7 , 251 from Parks et al 8 (which analysed rumen data from Wallace et al 9 and Shi et al 10 ), 1200 from Wilkinson et al 11 , 4199 released by Glendinning et al 12 (391 of which were the subject of the publication), and 20469 released by Stewart et al 3 (4941 of which were the subject of the publication).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%