1991
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-54059-8_85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MetaEdit— A flexible graphical environment for methodology modelling

Abstract: Existing CASE tools are often rigid and do not support the users' native methodologies. To alleviate this, more flexible and customisable tools called CASE shells are emerging. However, the customisation of those tools is still cumbersome and error-prone, and demands several configuration files that follow a rigid syntax of some metamodelling language(s). In order to make the eustomisation easier, we propose a graphical metamodelling editor, MetaEdit, with which the conceptual structures of the user methodolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, these initiatives (such as MetaEdit [27] and then MetaEdit+ [28]), GME [29] or MetaEnv [30] to mention just a few 2 ) were more focused on the creation of a modeling environment for the new metamodel plus some support for typical (forward) engineering activities, i.e., code generation to some popular languages.…”
Section: Mdre and Re: Current State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these initiatives (such as MetaEdit [27] and then MetaEdit+ [28]), GME [29] or MetaEnv [30] to mention just a few 2 ) were more focused on the creation of a modeling environment for the new metamodel plus some support for typical (forward) engineering activities, i.e., code generation to some popular languages.…”
Section: Mdre and Re: Current State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ADLs in these application domains has enabled automated system analysis, and automated code generation (e.g. MetaEdit+ [26]). However, given that such capabilities were less important for this project than our much simpler goals of easy adoption and straightforward system description, and the fact that these ADLs are specialised for embedded systems rather than large information systems, we did not feel that we should receive a return on the investment required to tailor and adopt them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MetaEdit+ (Tolvanen, 2004) is based on the discontinued MetaEdit tool (Smolander et al, 1991), but improves architectural aspects which were not resolved correctly and increases the scalability and efficiency of the tool. It is possible to create the metamodel and modeling in a single environment.…”
Section: Some Tools For Working With Mdementioning
confidence: 99%