Metadata Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories

Rücknagel, Jessika; Vierkant, Paul; Ulrich, Robert; Kloska, Gabriele; Schnepf, Edeltraud; Fichtmüller, David; Reuter, Evelyn; Semrau, Angelika; Kindling, Maxi; Pampel, Heinz; Witt, Michael; Fritze, Florian; Sandt, Stephanie van de; Klump, Jens; Goebelbecker, Hans-Jürgen; Skarupianski, Michael; Bertelmann, Roland; Schirmbacher, Peter; Scholze, Frank; Kramer, Claudia; Fuchs, C.; Spier, Shaked; Kirchhoff, Agnes

doi:10.2312/re3.008

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Re3data initiative (Re3data.Org, 2015;Rücknagel et al, 2015) addresses the goal of describing repositories via an online registry of research data repositories based on a common metadata standard describing such repositories. This metadata is then used to power a search interface.…”

Section: Re3datamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The bibliographic metadata schema is based on DataCite for simplicity, and is always required. Much of the information on the institution, including its policies, mirrors the re3data schema (Re3data.Org, 2015;Rücknagel et al, 2015), with much simplification. In particular, we are interested primarily in policyType="Preservation Policy" and policyType="Terms of Use".…”

Section: Metadata Packagementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Metajelo: a Metadata Package for Journals to Support External Linked Objects

Lagoze

Vilhuber

2021

IJDC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We propose a metadata package that is intended to provide academic journals with a lightweight means of registering, at the time of publication, the existence and disposition of supplementary materials. Information about the supplementary materials is, in most cases, critical for the reproducibility and replicability of scholarly results. In many instances, these materials are curated by a third party, which may or may not follow developing standards for the identification and description of those materials. As such, the vocabulary described here complements existing initiatives that specify vocabularies to describe the supplementary materials or the repositories and archives in which they have been deposited. Where possible, it reuses elements of relevant other vocabularies, facilitating coexistence with them. Furthermore, it provides an “at publication” record of reproducibility characteristics of a particular article that has been selected for publication. The proposed metadata package documents the key characteristics that journals care about in the case of supplementary materials that are held by third parties: existence, accessibility, and permanence. It does so in a robust, time-invariant fashion at the time of publication, when the editorial decisions are made. It also allows for better documentation of less accessible (non-public data), by treating it symmetrically from the point of view of the journal, therefore increasing the transparency of what up until now has been very opaque.

show abstract

Section: Re3datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Metadata Packagementioning

confidence: 99%