Metaconflict and international human rights law in dealing with Northern Ireland's past

Abstract

In many post-conflict societies, political actors battle to ensure the dominancy of their preferred narratives regarding the causes of and responsibilities for past violence. They wage these conflicts about the conflict to instrumentalise narratives of the past to serve their contemporary political aims, but in doing so, they contribute to the endurance of societal divisions which can have destructive effects on the promotion of reconciliation and political stability. Metaconflicts can be particularly heated with respect to the design and implementation of measures to deliver victims' rights to truth, justice and reparations, as it is through these processes that competing and complex communal narratives of the past are exposed and challenged. This article interrogates how metaconflicts shape political actors' engagement with or resistance to international legal obligations to investigate and prosecute past violations. The approaches of Northern Ireland's Unionist political parties and Unionist-aligned organisations to the United Kingdom's obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights are used as a case study. Through theoretically informed qualitative analysis of publicly available submissions made by these groups to an official consultation and parliamentary inquiries taking place during 2018, this article identifies four strategies used by Unionists to resist approaches to dealing with the past that they view as contrary to their interests. On this basis, the article argues that these actors understand law as a means to construct and provide official recognition for communally resonant moral and social categories and norms, and that, as such, legal principles such as the equality of the law, nondiscrimination and independence within the criminal justice process are viewed as secondary to political concerns. It concludes that reducing the metaconflict's destructive effects requires all parties to recognise the need for political generosity and compromise and to develop more substantive engagement with the principles of universality and equality underpinning international human rights law.

Impacts of Culture on Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence Among Fijian Indian Women in the United States

“…Since the arrival of Indians in Fiji as indentured servants, the relationship between native Fijians and Indians has been poor. Even after Fiji gained its independence from Great Britain in 1970, FIs remained a stigmatized ethnic group, facing racism, disproportionate poverty, barriers to land ownership, and underrepresentation in government (Nanda, 1992).…”

“Lessons from Northern Ireland” in Israeli Public Discourse: The Politics of Analogies in Conflicted Societies

“…NI also does not convey clear negative messages, as the frequent analogies to Vietnam or to Munich do. There were no undisputed winners and losers in the NI peace process, which has been fragmented, protracted, and often exhibited a piecemeal approach (Aoláin and Campbell, 2005), and where the “meta-conflict” over the causes and nature of the conflict still rages (Mallinder, 2019). Indeed, White (2013) argues that the ambiguities of the NI peace deal—allowing both sides to the conflict to maintain that they progress toward their goals—are its most important lesson.…”

Troubling places: Walking the “troubling remnants” of post‐conflict space

“…McCleery asserts that existing methodological orientations are partly responsible for this “stuckness” (2018, n.p.). He argues research frequently re‐treads well‐established ground, reiterating the same “macro socio‐political” factors underpinning competing narratives about the nature of the conflict – what Mallinder (2019) call the “metaconflict.” There is often a failure to conceptualise Northern Ireland as a “complex, contradictory, and incoherent assemblage of meanings, practices, and materialities” (O'Dowd & Komarova, 2013, p. 528). This calls to mind Diana Taylor's (1997, p. 187) monumental study of post‐ junta Argentina, where becoming “trapped in bad scripts” reifies rather than troubles dominant political narratives and conceptualised space.…”