Metacomprehension Monitoring Accuracy: Effects of Judgment Frames, Cues and Criteria

Chen, Qishan

doi:10.1007/s10936-022-09837-z

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thiede et al's (2003) findings clearly demonstrate that accurate metacomprehension is related to efficient regulation of study activities, which in turn produces superior learning outcomes. Many subsequent studies have observed similar findings in different languages and populations (e.g., Ackerman & Goldsmith, 2011;Chen, 2008Chen, , 2009de Bruin et al, 2011;Engelen et al, 2018;Little & McDaniel, 2015;Ni, 2019;Shiu & Chen, 2013;Thiede et al, , 2017Xu & Shi, 2008).…”

mentioning

confidence: 71%

Mind the Gap Between Comprehension and Metacomprehension: Meta-Analysis of Metacomprehension Accuracy and Intervention Effectiveness

Yang¹,

Zhao

Yuan

et al. 2022

Review of Educational Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research has consistently demonstrated that learners are strikingly poor at metacognitively monitoring their learning and comprehension of texts. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to explore three important questions about metacomprehension: (a) To what extent can people accurately discriminate well-learned texts from less well learned ones? (b) What are the (meta)cognitive causes of poor metacomprehension accuracy? and (c) What interventions improve the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? In total, the meta-analysis integrated 502 effects and data from 15,889 participants across 115 studies to assess these questions. The results showed a weighted mean correlation of .178 for nonintervention effects. Many interventions were shown to be effective, such as delayed summary writing and delayed keyword generation. In addition, combining different interventions tended to generate additive benefits. The findings support the transfer-appropriate monitoring account, the situation model framework, and the poor-comprehension theory as explanations for why metacomprehension accuracy is typically poor. Practical implications are discussed.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 71%

Mind the Gap Between Comprehension and Metacomprehension: Meta-Analysis of Metacomprehension Accuracy and Intervention Effectiveness

Yang¹,

Zhao

Yuan

et al. 2022

Review of Educational Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to the ideas of scientists (Chen, 2022;Lu et al, 2019) the semantic and pragmatic functions of discursive units should be studied in a real process of communication. Scientists (Alyami & Mohsen, 2019;Brysbaert & Stevens, 2018;Rezaei & Mousanezhad Jeddi, 2020) offer two possible approaches to do such analysis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Semantic and Pragmatic Meaning of Discursive Units in the Process of Communication of a Psychotherapist with a Client

Maksymenko,

Ivashkevych,

Kharchenko

et al. 2023

Psycholing.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of our research is to study semantic and pragmatic meaning of discursive units in the process of communication of a psychotherapist with teenagers with autonomic dysfunctions, using the methods of Positive Psychotherapy. Methods. The main method which has been used in our article was the method of providing psychological help to teenagers with autonomic dysfunction with a help of a five-step model of Positive Psychotherapy (Peseschkian, 2000). To analyze the empirical results of the study the psychodiagnostic technique “Balance Model of Mental Energy Distribution” was used (Peseschkian, 2000). We also used the author’s 24-scale bipolar version of the semantic differential for understanding the semantic and pragmatic meaning of discursive units in the process of communication of a psychotherapist with a client. Results. In our research we determined the semantic and pragmatic meanings of discursive words, such as: (1) actualization of the previous context; (2) anthropocentricity of the statement; (3) synonymy of the context given by discursive words; (4) antonymy of the context given by discursive words; (5) hyponymic context given by discursive words; (6) amplification of the previous context; (7) amplification of conclusions using updated key statements; (8) expectedness/unexpectedness of the addresser’s statement. Conclusions. The specificity of paradigmatic connections of discursive words (first of all, synonymous, antonymic, hyponymic, anthropocentric, actualized, amplified, expected or unexpected) is determined by their contextual dependence. We call such semantic and pragmatic communicative meanings, which differentiate discursive words in the paradigm of communicative situations in the process of communication between a psychotherapist and a client, intentional scripts. They are distinguished by variable lexical and functional possibilities, depending on the context of the utterance, as well as different variations of lexical and semantic, pragmatic and functional constructions.

show abstract

“…Speaking as a productive activity appears as a process of construction, creation of a certain task for other people. Listening is an externally unexpressed process of the subject's internal activity, which is caused by the need to form and to formulate certain content given from outside (Chen, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psycholinguistic Paradigm of Transformational Model of English-Ukrainian Translation

Ivashkevych¹

2023

Problems of Modern Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

the purpose of our research is: 1) to show the main psychological characteristics of oral translation activity; 2) to organize the ascertainment study and to analyze the results of it according to the selected criteria, such as: a) the level of students’ communicative and speaking activity; b) the level of personal and situational anxiety; c) the language hearing level; 3) to propose Transfor-mational Model of EnglishUkrainian Translation, using English phraseological units, and to describe it.methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: the categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. The empirical method is ascertaining research.the results of the research. We think that the data of psycholinguistic ob-servations are the means of modifying existing models of implementation of translation activities. We propose a universal Transformational Model of Eng-lishUkrainian Translation as the most possible translation model. We believe that this model includes three stages: 1) the analysis, during which the surface structure in language A is reduced to a set of grammatical transformations (the analysis taking into account grammatical relations and meanings of linguistic units); 2) transferring the analyzed material from language A to language B; 3) the reconstruction or final adaptation of the final message taking into account the norms of the language having been used to translate the text.conclusions. We proved that grammatical transformations were one of the methods of semantic analysis of the original text and one of the ways of con-structing the final statement. However, reducing the translation to only gram-matical transformations somewhat simplifies the real process of translation, since it uses both lexicalsyntactic paraphrasing and semantic modifications due to situationalpragmatic factors, etc. As a result, the translation itself is con-sidered by us as a combination of three components: on the one hand, it is a product, on the other one, it is a certain number of technologies, and on the third hand, it is a process of combining (for the translator) a certain set of signs (the original text) and taking into account the effectiveness of semantic perception by the recipient of a set of signs offered to him/her by the translator.

show abstract

Metacomprehension Monitoring Accuracy: Effects of Judgment Frames, Cues and Criteria

Cited by 8 publications

References 33 publications

Mind the Gap Between Comprehension and Metacomprehension: Meta-Analysis of Metacomprehension Accuracy and Intervention Effectiveness

Mind the Gap Between Comprehension and Metacomprehension: Meta-Analysis of Metacomprehension Accuracy and Intervention Effectiveness

Semantic and Pragmatic Meaning of Discursive Units in the Process of Communication of a Psychotherapist with a Client

Psycholinguistic Paradigm of Transformational Model of English-Ukrainian Translation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About