2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metacognitive monitoring in schizotypy: Systematic literature review and new empirical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 87 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study found evidence of a relationship between negative schizotypy, decentration, and an awareness of others [65]. Furthermore, one recent systematic review and empirical study concluded that higher rates of schizotypy were associated with various factors related to metacognitive deficits, including a maladaptive and overly self-referential metacognitive style and reduced introspective insight [66]. In the experimental part of this study, individuals with higher levels of schizotypy showed lower insight and maladaptive self-regulatory processes, which could be connected to the transdiagnostic S-REF model of metacognition discussed above.…”
Section: Metacognition In Schizotypymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study found evidence of a relationship between negative schizotypy, decentration, and an awareness of others [65]. Furthermore, one recent systematic review and empirical study concluded that higher rates of schizotypy were associated with various factors related to metacognitive deficits, including a maladaptive and overly self-referential metacognitive style and reduced introspective insight [66]. In the experimental part of this study, individuals with higher levels of schizotypy showed lower insight and maladaptive self-regulatory processes, which could be connected to the transdiagnostic S-REF model of metacognition discussed above.…”
Section: Metacognition In Schizotypymentioning
confidence: 99%