2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20162331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metacognitive awareness- evaluation and implications in medical students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of metacognitive regulation, the present research finding indicates that metacognitive regulation of female learners better than male. However, the exist differences between male and female learners in their metacognitive regulation is in accordance with studies conducted by Panda [21] and Panchu et al [36] as they found the differences in male and female metacognitive as well. Panda [21] found that male students better in metacognitive regulation compared to female while female students better in metacognitive knowledge than male.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of metacognitive regulation, the present research finding indicates that metacognitive regulation of female learners better than male. However, the exist differences between male and female learners in their metacognitive regulation is in accordance with studies conducted by Panda [21] and Panchu et al [36] as they found the differences in male and female metacognitive as well. Panda [21] found that male students better in metacognitive regulation compared to female while female students better in metacognitive knowledge than male.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…More detail explored on metacognition in some research reports, there are several studies have been carried out by researchers. They discussed various type of metacognition such as metacognitive skills [6]- [12], metacognitive strategy [13]- [16], metacognitive judgement [17], and metacognitive awareness [18]- [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Tansyani (2016), consciousness in significant levels of metacognition is closely related to student's ability to develop and use improved learning process by designing enhanced models, monitoring, evaluating and reflecting on the process of learning. Ulfa, Sistiana, and Setiono (2018), cite a number of authors (Fauzi, 2013;Panchu, Bahuleyan, Seethalakshmi, & Thomas, 2016) who emphasized the need for good metacognition during learning and demanded great efforts from teachers and lecturers to empower students with metacognitive abilities. The argument from these authors presupposes that student with good metacognitive awareness will learn better and faster relative to those who do not have good metacognitive awareness.…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kemampuan metakognitif yang belum berkembang dapat dipengaruhi oleh cara evaluasi. Penilaian berperan penting pada pembelajaran IPA agar guru mengetahui kemampuan siswa sehingga dapat dilakukan tindak lanjut yang tepat untuk siswa (Iskandar, 2014;Kallio, Virta, & Kallio, 2018;Nurwahidah, 2017;Panchu, Bahuleyan, Seethalakshmi, & Thomas, 2016). Penilaian yang baik adalah penilaian yang menekankan pada proses yang terjadi (Fauziya & Suhara, 2015).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified