2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-020-09578-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metacognition About Practice Testing: a Review of Learners’ Beliefs, Monitoring, and Control of Test-Enhanced Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
4
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that students completed the practice test too close to the exam to affect their study strategies and calibration. Learners also tend to test themselves only under conditions that encourage retrieval success ( 36 ). It is possible that the lowest-performing students in the class engaged in fewer of the available alternative practice activities because they were not confident that they could be successful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is possible that students completed the practice test too close to the exam to affect their study strategies and calibration. Learners also tend to test themselves only under conditions that encourage retrieval success ( 36 ). It is possible that the lowest-performing students in the class engaged in fewer of the available alternative practice activities because they were not confident that they could be successful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is possible that the learner characteristics of those who completed practice tests differed from those of students who did not. For example, students who completed the practice tests may have been more likely to believe that they could be successful ( 36 ). Students who completed practice tests could have had higher levels of metacognitive knowledge and regulation than others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we didn't find final exams. According to [27], exams increase learner anxiety. In our case exams were replaced by auto evaluation throw quizzes, scheduling collaborative activities and debates to encourage discussion and sharing of ideas and experiences.…”
Section: Data Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effekte von Abrufübungen auf die Genauigkeit metakognitiven MonitoringsNeben den abrufbedingten Effekten auf Verfügbarkeit und Transfer von Wissen gibt es auch Belege dafür, dass Abrufübungen die Genauigkeit des metakognitiven Monitorings verbessern können(Rivers 2020). Metakognitives Monitoring bezeichnet die Überwachung des eigenen Lernprozesses und wird oft anhand voraus-oder rückschauender subjektiver Einschätzungen von Lernprozessen und -ergebnissen beurteilt.…”
unclassified