2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-014-0677-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabonomics of human fecal extracts characterize ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and healthy individuals

Abstract: This study employs spectroscopy-based metabolic profiling of fecal extracts from healthy subjects and patients with active or inactive ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) to substantiate the potential use of spectroscopy as a non-invasive diagnostic tool and to characterize the fecal metabolome in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Stool samples from 113 individuals (UC 48, CD 44, controls 21) were analyzed by 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Bruker 600 MHz, Bruker BioSpin, Rheins… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
176
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(73 reference statements)
9
176
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Marchesi et al [32] demonstrated that the relative amounts of amino acids and glycerol were increased and the levels of butyrate and acetate were decreased in the feces of CD patients which contributed to the differentiation between patients with CD and UC. In a recent study of Bjerrum et al [33] , a clear different differentiation between CD and UC patients based on fecal profiles was found. However, after removal of patients with intestinal surgery and anti-TNF-α treatment, the distinction was eliminated indicating the necessity to evaluate the results for possible confounding factors.…”
Section: Differentiation Of Ibd Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Marchesi et al [32] demonstrated that the relative amounts of amino acids and glycerol were increased and the levels of butyrate and acetate were decreased in the feces of CD patients which contributed to the differentiation between patients with CD and UC. In a recent study of Bjerrum et al [33] , a clear different differentiation between CD and UC patients based on fecal profiles was found. However, after removal of patients with intestinal surgery and anti-TNF-α treatment, the distinction was eliminated indicating the necessity to evaluate the results for possible confounding factors.…”
Section: Differentiation Of Ibd Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As a result of the dysbiosis identified in fecal samples of IBD patients, a number of studies investigated the metabolite profile in feces or fecal extracts. In the studies by Marchesi et al [32] and Bjerrum et al [33] , higher levels of amino acids and but lower levels of SCFA were found in fecal extracts of IBD patients as compared to HCs using the 1 H-NMR technology. The depletion of SCFA in IBD patients versus HCs are not novel and have often been described in the past few years.…”
Section: Ibd Disease Signature: Case-control Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Metabolomic analysis of fecal samples has revealed calprotectin or lactoferrin as valuable biomarkers for early detection of inflammatory bowel diseases [24,25]. NMR spectroscopy [26][27][28][29], GC-MS [30][31][32] and LC-MS [33][34][35] have been used to find biomarkers of intestinal diseases in stool material from human and rodents. The use of metabolomics in the study of bowel diseases was recently reviewed [23,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathobiological mechanisms underlying our findings remain unclear but may be related to the altered bile acid milieu or altered microbiome (17,18) and metabolome (1921) that exist in a chronically inflamed colon and can persist after colectomy. Altered bile acid profiles in the setting of chronic IBD and after colectomy have been reported (2224), and whether these changes could injure the biliary epithelia via the enterohepatic circulation or modify the biliary microenvironment to promote malignant transformation remains plausible, although unconfirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%