2013
DOI: 10.1021/ac402477z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MetaboLyzer: A Novel Statistical Workflow for Analyzing Postprocessed LC–MS Metabolomics Data

Abstract: Metabolomics, the global study of small molecules in a particular system, has in the last few years risen to become a primary –omics platform for the study of metabolic processes. With the ever-increasing pool of quantitative data yielded from metabolomic research, specialized methods and tools with which to analyze and extract meaningful conclusions from these data are becoming more and more crucial. Furthermore, the depth of knowledge and expertise required to undertake a metabolomics oriented study is a dau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, creatinine relative intensity in the control mice over the course of the study was 32.87 ± 1.87, and for the HDR and LDR mice, these values were 34.60 ± 1.39 and 34.20 ± 1.04, respectively. The normalized data were then analyzed using traditional statistical tools such as SIMCA-P + , Random Forests (RF), and Metabolyzer (Mak et al 2014) to determine whether the urinary metabolomic profile of LDR-irradiated mice could be distinguished from that of HDR-irradiated mice at matching doses. Although LDR and HDR share many similarities in their urinary metabolomic profiles, subtle and unique differences were observed with dose rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, creatinine relative intensity in the control mice over the course of the study was 32.87 ± 1.87, and for the HDR and LDR mice, these values were 34.60 ± 1.39 and 34.20 ± 1.04, respectively. The normalized data were then analyzed using traditional statistical tools such as SIMCA-P + , Random Forests (RF), and Metabolyzer (Mak et al 2014) to determine whether the urinary metabolomic profile of LDR-irradiated mice could be distinguished from that of HDR-irradiated mice at matching doses. Although LDR and HDR share many similarities in their urinary metabolomic profiles, subtle and unique differences were observed with dose rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An in-house statistical algorithm called Metabolyzer (Mak et al 2014) was used along with SIMCA-P+ (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) and Random Forests (RF) to determine the metabolites that contributed the most to the differentiation between urinary profiles of irradiated samples and that of the controls in LDR and HDR groups. When comparing data from control versus radiationexposed animals, metabolites with non-zero abundance values in at least 70 % of samples in both groups (com-plete-presence ions) were first identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Univariate statistical analysis was performed on the neutron vs. X ray groups (1 Gy) at days 1 and 7 postirradiation with the in-house statistical software, MetaboLyzer (30). For complete presence ions (≥75% presence in each group), statistically significant ions ( P < 0.05) were identified with Welch’s t test with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.2, while statistically significant ( P < 0.05) partial presence ions (<75% presence in each group) with FDR = 0.2 were identified with the categorical Barnard’s test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volcano plots (of analytes present in ≥70% of samples in a group, false discovery rates determined by Benjamini–Hochberg step-up procedure, significant ions determined with Welch’s t test) were generated with the in-house statistical software MetaboLyzer, and unsupervised standard singular value decomposition-based principal component analysis (PCA) plots were generated. 35 Statistically significant ions were determined with a Kruskal–Wallis test and a posthoc Duncan test in SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC). Significant ions were validated by matching their retention indices and EI spectra to authentic standards or the LECO/Fiehn Metabolomics Library and comparison with the NIST mass spectral library.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%