2014
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolomic and 13C‐metabolic flux analysis of a xylose‐consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain expressing xylose isomerase

Abstract: Over the past two decades significant progress has been made in the engineering of xylose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for production of lignocellulosic biofuels. However, the ethanol productivities achieved on xylose are still significantly lower than those observed on glucose for reasons that are not well understood. We have undertaken an analysis of central carbon metabolite pool sizes and metabolic fluxes on glucose and on xylose under aerobic and anaerobic conditions in a strain capable of r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The substrate specificities of Xfpk(LM) and Xfpk(CA) appear to be very similar, while the specificity of Xfpk(BB) towards F6P was considerably higher than for the other two candidates, making it an interesting enzyme candidate to evaluate in vivo where intracellular concentrations of F6P should be significantly higher than of X5P during glucose conditions (Wasylenko and Stephanopoulos 2015). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substrate specificities of Xfpk(LM) and Xfpk(CA) appear to be very similar, while the specificity of Xfpk(BB) towards F6P was considerably higher than for the other two candidates, making it an interesting enzyme candidate to evaluate in vivo where intracellular concentrations of F6P should be significantly higher than of X5P during glucose conditions (Wasylenko and Stephanopoulos 2015). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the Stephanopoulos lab developed several efficient yeast strains for xylose utilization. S. cerevisiae strain H131-A3-AL is reported to have maximum growth rates of 0.23 h −1 and 0.20 h −1 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively, and specific xylose utilization rates of 1.50 g/g/h and 1.87 g/g/h, respectively (Wasylenko and Stephanopoulos, 2014; Zhou et al, 2012). Thus, compared to these strains, Geobacillus LC300 has a xylose utilization rate that is 3-times higher than the best metabolically engineered S. cerevisiae strain to date, and grows 3-times faster than E. coli on xylose under its optimal growth conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the overall performance of the oxidoreductase pathway was significantly improved under anaerobic conditions when coupling with a reductive acetate metabolic pathway [25 ]. In addition, a recent report indicated that xylose cannot fully activate the fermentation process as well as glucose, which may lead to a lower glycolytic bottleneck and lower ethanol yield from xylose [26]. More efforts are required for tackling this fundamental problem.…”
Section: Metabolic Engineering For the Utilization Of Non-glucose Sugarsmentioning
confidence: 97%