2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolomic and inflammatory signatures of symptom dimensions in major depression

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(69 reference statements)
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depressive symptoms such as Sleeping too much, Low energy level and Increase in weight form a subgroup referred to as atypical, energy-related symptoms. These share associations with cardiometabolic diseases (Alshehri et al, 2021;Lamers et al, 2018), and inflammatory and metabolic dysregulations (Brydges et al, 2022;Lamers et al, 2020;Milaneschi et al, 2020), which is congruent with the present findings. This clustering of atypical energy-related symptoms sharing associations with heightened levels of inflammation is referred to as Immunometabolic Depression (IMD).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Depressive symptoms such as Sleeping too much, Low energy level and Increase in weight form a subgroup referred to as atypical, energy-related symptoms. These share associations with cardiometabolic diseases (Alshehri et al, 2021;Lamers et al, 2018), and inflammatory and metabolic dysregulations (Brydges et al, 2022;Lamers et al, 2020;Milaneschi et al, 2020), which is congruent with the present findings. This clustering of atypical energy-related symptoms sharing associations with heightened levels of inflammation is referred to as Immunometabolic Depression (IMD).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, we added two sensitivity analyses in which we first investigated the impact of the inclusion of increased sleepiness symptom among atypical energy-related symptom profile (i.e., by adding it as an extra symptom to the score) on the results. Second, to further confirm the specificity of the associations detected for AES, we derived similarly to previous work [15][16][17] a melancholic symptom profile score (0-24 range) including the following melancholic features [24]: diurnal variation (mood worse in the morning), early morning awakening, distinct quality of mood, excessive guilt, decreased appetite, decreased weight, psychomotor agitation and psychomotor retardation. All analyses were done using R version 4.0.2, and for the meta-analysis step, package (rmeta) was used.…”
Section: B Association Between Grs-mua Grs-mha and Atypical Energy-re...mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We expect that metabolic dysregulations may represent the shared link connecting obesity with the AES profile. Studies have shown that the atypical energy-related symptom profile is associated with an adverse immuno-metabolic profile, such as BMI and CRP [15,16], and biomarkers of neurotoxicity (kynurenine and quinolinic acid) related to low grade inflammation [17]. In the present study, we used genomics to separate the effect of adiposity from that of metabolic dysregulations to examine whether the link between obesity and AES is dependent on metabolic dysregulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…153 metabolites met quality control criteria in both the PGRN-AMPS and CO-MED datasets ( Supplementary Table S1 ). The p180 platform has demonstrated utility in characterizing related psychiatric phenotypes, including MDD and antidepressant response ( Gupta et al, 2016 ; Neavin et al, 2016 ; Athreya et al, 2018 ; Bhattacharyya et al, 2019 ; Czysz et al, 2019 ; Ahmed et al, 2020 ; Joyce et al, 2021 ; MahmoudianDehkordi et al, 2021 ; Brydges et al, 2022 ), schizophrenia ( Parksepp et al, 2020 ), and psychosis ( Kriisa et al, 2017 ; Balotsev et al, 2019 ), but has not yet been investigated in the context of suicidality. Therefore, all metabolites meeting quality control criteria were included in the current integration analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%