2020
DOI: 10.3390/metabo10050201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolite Genome-Wide Association Study (mGWAS) and Gene-Metabolite Interaction Network Analysis Reveal Potential Biomarkers for Feed Efficiency in Pigs

Abstract: Metabolites represent the ultimate response of biological systems, so metabolomics is considered the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Feed efficiency is one of the most important phenotypes in sustainable pig production and is the main breeding goal trait. We utilized metabolic and genomic datasets from a total of 108 pigs from our own previously published studies that involved 59 Duroc and 49 Landrace pigs with data on feed efficiency (residual feed intake (RFI)), genotype (PorcineSNP80 BeadChip) data, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Liao et al found that significant differences in levels of glutamine, cysteine, and glutamic acid among different beef cattle breeds led to alterations in the metabolism of cysteine, methionine, and glutamate, which are related to heat stress adaptability [8]. Wang et al indicated that plasma alanine and proline were potential biomarkers for feed efficiency in Duroc and Landrace pigs due to their important roles in the metabolism of alanine, arginine, and proline [51]. Other studies have demonstrated that serum concentrations of glycine, histidine, lysine, and serine were associated with diverging RFI of different broiler chicken lines which may be attributed to their contributions to protein biosynthesis and ammonia recycling [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Liao et al found that significant differences in levels of glutamine, cysteine, and glutamic acid among different beef cattle breeds led to alterations in the metabolism of cysteine, methionine, and glutamate, which are related to heat stress adaptability [8]. Wang et al indicated that plasma alanine and proline were potential biomarkers for feed efficiency in Duroc and Landrace pigs due to their important roles in the metabolism of alanine, arginine, and proline [51]. Other studies have demonstrated that serum concentrations of glycine, histidine, lysine, and serine were associated with diverging RFI of different broiler chicken lines which may be attributed to their contributions to protein biosynthesis and ammonia recycling [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is further substantiated by the fact that metabolites represent cells' ultimate physiological response and thereby represent a link between genotype and phenotype (Wang and Kadarmideen 2020). GWAS-based studies, using SNP chips and LC-MS metabolomics, the identified mechanism underlying the genetic variation in pigs for feed efficiency (Banerjee et al, 2020;Wang and Kadarmideen 2020). Integrating high-density SNP data and metabolite information with predictive value was also found to help improve the accuracy of genetic selection in cattle (Ehret et al, 2015).…”
Section: Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that genomic prediction to predict breeding values based on phenotypic, pedigree, and genomic data is insufficient to describe the genetic potential of animals, incorporating the whole-metabolomic data in the genomic prediction equation may play a crucial role in increasing the genetic gain by increasing the accuracy of selection. The latter is further substantiated by the fact that metabolites represent cells' ultimate physiological response and thereby represent a link between genotype and phenotype (Wang and Kadarmideen 2020). GWAS-based studies, using SNP chips and LC-MS metabolomics, the identified mechanism underlying the genetic variation in pigs for feed efficiency (Banerjee et al, 2020;Wang and Kadarmideen 2020).…”
Section: Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, identifying biological pathways affecting FE is challenging, and GWAS studies are limited in finding the chromosomal regions or preselected genes that might be related to FE ( Singer, 2009 ). Instead, a growing number of studies have applied omics methods to explore the mechanisms affecting FE in pigs, including transcriptomics ( Vigors et al, 2019 ; Xu et al, 2020a ), 16S rRNA gene sequencing ( Quan et al, 2018 ; Si et al, 2020 ), proteomics ( Wu et al, 2020 ), and metabolomics ( Carmelo et al, 2020 ; Wang and Kadarmideen, 2020 ). By screening and analyzing the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and related biological pathways derived from transcriptomics studies, candidate genes and pathways affecting FE can be identified ( Nagalakshmi et al, 2008 ; Wilhelm and Landry, 2009 ).…”
Section: Genomics Of Feed Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%