1968
DOI: 10.1093/jn/94.3.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolism of Radioactive Cesium (134Cs and 137Cs) and Potassium by Dairy Cattle as Influenced by High and Low Forage Diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased excretion of radiocaesium by modification of dietary intake of potassium and sodium (Mraz et al 1957), other primary nutrients (Johnson et al 1968;Snipes & Riedesel, 1969) and even stable caesium (Furchner & Richmond, 1962) was not very effective. The mixing of additives such as vermiculite (Hazzard et al 1969) or bentonite (Van den Hoek, 1976) up to 10% of daily food intake was necessary to achieve an 80% reduction of caesium in milk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The increased excretion of radiocaesium by modification of dietary intake of potassium and sodium (Mraz et al 1957), other primary nutrients (Johnson et al 1968;Snipes & Riedesel, 1969) and even stable caesium (Furchner & Richmond, 1962) was not very effective. The mixing of additives such as vermiculite (Hazzard et al 1969) or bentonite (Van den Hoek, 1976) up to 10% of daily food intake was necessary to achieve an 80% reduction of caesium in milk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sources have included the following: herbage contaminated by a variety of mechanisms including root uptake, marine discharges from the Sellafield reprocessing plant, and Chernobyl fallout; ewes' milk; and a range of different soil types. These authors have expressed their results in terms of the ratio of the equilibrium activity concentration of radiocesium in milk or meat to the daily intake of radiocesium [defined as the transfer coefficient by Johnson et al (18)]. While observed differences in this ratio may be due to variation in bioavailability, it may not be the only cause as transfer coefficients can be influenced by a number of physiological parameters such as feeding and growth rates (19) or stage of lactation (20).…”
Section: Radiocesiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, those sheep with lower 137 Cs intakes grazed areas of fine grass swards dominated by Agrostis spp., which is likely to have had a higher digestibility [32] than those species grazed by sheep with high 137 Cs intakes. Previous studies have suggested a comparatively low transfer to ruminants of dietary radiocaesium associated with herbages of low digestibility [19,33,34]. This is probably the result of a reduction in the degree of 137 Cs absorption.…”
Section: Estimation Of Radiocaesium Intakementioning
confidence: 98%