1967
DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(67)90054-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolism of chlormezanone in man and laboratory animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However this negative result may be due to the fact that the authors did not take into account the pharmacokinetics of the compound, and evaluated its phannacodynamic activity one hour after administration while the C, , , occurs between 2 hours (McChesney et al, 1967) and 4 hours after dosing (Ohya et al, 1980). In contrast, Hindmarch and Gudgeon found that the repeated administration of 600 mg per day for 5 days caused a significant decrease in performance on the digit symbol substitution test as well as a subjective feeling of tiredness.…”
Section: Accepted I7 March 1991mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However this negative result may be due to the fact that the authors did not take into account the pharmacokinetics of the compound, and evaluated its phannacodynamic activity one hour after administration while the C, , , occurs between 2 hours (McChesney et al, 1967) and 4 hours after dosing (Ohya et al, 1980). In contrast, Hindmarch and Gudgeon found that the repeated administration of 600 mg per day for 5 days caused a significant decrease in performance on the digit symbol substitution test as well as a subjective feeling of tiredness.…”
Section: Accepted I7 March 1991mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similarly, Hindmarch and Gudgeon (1 983) found no evidence of any sedative effect of chlormezanone after a single administration of 200 mg using a test battery of established sensitivity to the sedative effects of benzodiazepines (Wittenborn, 1979;Hindmarch, 1980;Johnson and Chernik, 1982). However this negative result may be due to the fact that the authors did not take into account the pharmacokinetics of the compound, and evaluated its phannacodynamic activity one hour after administration while the C, , , occurs between 2 hours (McChesney et al, 1967) and 4 hours after dosing (Ohya et al, 1980). In contrast, Hindmarch and Gudgeon found that the repeated administration of 600 mg per day for 5 days caused a significant decrease in performance on the digit symbol substitution test as well as a subjective feeling of tiredness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several representative and well-known pharmaceutical inhibitors containing alkyl-alkyl sulfones are shown in Scheme 1a. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Conventionally, sulfones are prepared via the oxidation of sulfides with strong oxidants after thiol-involved couplings, 11,12 resulting in low functional group compatibility. Strategies for sulfone construction via the introduction of hypervalent sulfur in the same oxidation state into organic frameworks are of great interest due to the oxidative economy and step economy of such processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trancopal is an anxiolytic agent with a known sedative action (Gauz 1959) which has been used on a 200 mg three times daily basis for several years. Since the agent has a plasma half-life of 24 hours (McChesney et al 1967) the possibility of giving the drug once daily in a 400 mg dose at night was put forward. The sedative action could then be of benefit in helping the patient to sleep at night and the extended halflife might give a sufficient residual level of the drug on the following day to reduce anxiety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%