2006
DOI: 10.1080/02699050500487571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolism and nutrition in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

Abstract: The impact of timing, content and ways of administration of nutritional support on neurological outcome after TBI remains to be demonstrated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We are aware of only one previous systematic review of hypermetabolism following TBI that incorporated the results from 14 trials, published from 1993 through 2003 (Krakau et al, 2006). These authors reported similar, although less variable results compared with the present study, with deviations in MEE=PEE of 96-160%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…We are aware of only one previous systematic review of hypermetabolism following TBI that incorporated the results from 14 trials, published from 1993 through 2003 (Krakau et al, 2006). These authors reported similar, although less variable results compared with the present study, with deviations in MEE=PEE of 96-160%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Metabolism rates range between 96 % and 160 % of the predicted values (Krakau et al 2006). In patients with barbiturate coma therapy or in those receiving neuromuscular blocking drugs, energy consumption could be reduced from 160 % to 120 %, which is still an elevated value.…”
Section: How Many Calories Should Be Administered?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such complications include well-known conditions such as swallowing dysfunction, autonomic dysfunction, 57 posttraumatic epilepsy, hydrocephalus, or abnormal muscle activity where the arsenal of specific interventions is growing but where there is much need of systematic evaluation. This is even more so for other systemic complications such as dysautonomy, disturbed energy, 58 and hormone balance, 59 all of which may potentially influence the recovery process. These somatic complications might be considered as ''secondary insults'' with a possible impact on long-term outcome in analogy, with secondary insults identified during neurointensive care.…”
Section: Further Potential and Challenges Related To The Early Rehabimentioning
confidence: 98%