2005
DOI: 10.1079/bjn20051464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolisable energy consumption in the exclusively breast-fed infant aged 3–6 months from the developed world: a systematic review

Abstract: The present study aimed to evaluate evidence on metabolisable energy consumption and pattern of consumption with age in infants in the developed world who were exclusively breast-fed, at around the time of introducing complementary feeding. We carried out a systematic review aimed at answering three questions: how much milk is transferred from mother to infant?; does transfer increase with the age of the infant?; and what is the metabolisable energy content of breast milk? Thirty-three eligible studies of 1041… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(34 reference statements)
4
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated energy consumption with the assumption that the metabolizable energy content of breast milk at age 6 mo is 62.1 kcal/100 g (4). Current WHO guidelines for energy requirements in breastfed infants at age 6 mo are 78 kcal Á kg 21 Á d 21 (35), which in this study would equate to 625 kcal/d for the average EBF infant in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We calculated energy consumption with the assumption that the metabolizable energy content of breast milk at age 6 mo is 62.1 kcal/100 g (4). Current WHO guidelines for energy requirements in breastfed infants at age 6 mo are 78 kcal Á kg 21 Á d 21 (35), which in this study would equate to 625 kcal/d for the average EBF infant in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to published data on breast milk (intake, energy content) and infant energy requirements, average intakes would fail to meet energy requirements in the average 6-mo-old infant (4), although this approach relied on various assumptions about breast-milk energy content. However, insufficient relevant evidence is available, particularly in EBF infants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of analyzing samples is considerable-often several hundred dollars per participant. In addition, doubly labeled water may also under-or over-estimate intake, with ranges (15% over to 5% under) similar to those seen in test weighing protocols (Haisma et al, 2003;Reilly et al, 2005;Scanlon et al, 2002;Wells et al, 1996).…”
Section: Measuring Volume and Infant Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear whether the slower infancy weight gain in breast‐fed babies is a result of lower total calorie intake or related to the nutrient composition of human breast milk (HM). Previous studies documenting HM energy or macronutrient contents have been recently reviewed 7, 8. Most were performed in small sample sizes, and few attempted to assess the influence of HM composition on subsequent infancy growth outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%