2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic Syndrome Rates in United States Adolescents, from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2002

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
219
1
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
14
219
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Even lean patients had high prevalence of multiple CVRF, with nearly one-quarter having two or three CVRF. Overweight (BMI Ͼ85 th to Յ95 th percentile) participants had very high prevalence of multiple CVRF, similar to rates in obese (BMI Ͼ95 th percentile) children without kidney disease (28). This pattern differentiates the population of children with CKD from healthy children, in whom the coexistence of multiple CVRF is extremely infrequent, and restricted to those who are obese (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Even lean patients had high prevalence of multiple CVRF, with nearly one-quarter having two or three CVRF. Overweight (BMI Ͼ85 th to Յ95 th percentile) participants had very high prevalence of multiple CVRF, similar to rates in obese (BMI Ͼ95 th percentile) children without kidney disease (28). This pattern differentiates the population of children with CKD from healthy children, in whom the coexistence of multiple CVRF is extremely infrequent, and restricted to those who are obese (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is fairly consistent with a recent paper by Johnson et al from NHANES, in which about half of the participants had at least one disordered measurement, with an overall MetS prevalence of 8.6%, which is higher than our data, partly due to different MetS criteria used by Johnson et al (7). Also using NHANES data, Cook et al reported that the prevalence of MetS among adolescents varied from just >9% to as low as 2%, depending on the criteria used (27). Therefore, our population is on the lower limit of this MetS estimate; however, as our study was conducted among high school students interested in nutrition and medical research, who are more fit and have a lower BMI, it is likely that this is an underestimate compared with the general adolescent population in Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of MetS varies during childhood and adolescence (3,4) . Regardless of the classification criteria, studies corroborate the increased prevalence of MetS among overweight and obese adolescents (5)(6)(7)(8) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%