2007
DOI: 10.5551/jat.14.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic Syndrome may be a Risk Factor for Early Carotid Atherosclerosis in Women but not in Men

Abstract: Aim: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic abnormalities and a predictor of both type 2 diabetes mellitus and adverse cardiovascular events. Whether there are gender differences in the association between early atherosclerosis and MetS has not yet been thoroughly elucidated. Methods: The subjects consisted of 388 men aged 64 16 years and 480 women aged 70 13 years. Early atherosclerosis was assessed by carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) on B-mode ultrasonography. Results: Carotid IMT values wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with the observation of increased carotid IMT in young black and white adults (aged 20 -38 years) with MetS (8), as well as with reports from European populations (9,18,19). Some recent reports (9,12) have suggested a differential effect of MetS on carotid IMT by sex. In this sample, we did not find a substantial difference in the p a t t e r n s o f a s s o c i a t i o n b e t w e e n HOMA-IR or MetS and either carotid IMT or CAC by sex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are consistent with the observation of increased carotid IMT in young black and white adults (aged 20 -38 years) with MetS (8), as well as with reports from European populations (9,18,19). Some recent reports (9,12) have suggested a differential effect of MetS on carotid IMT by sex. In this sample, we did not find a substantial difference in the p a t t e r n s o f a s s o c i a t i o n b e t w e e n HOMA-IR or MetS and either carotid IMT or CAC by sex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Few studies have considered both insulin resistance and MetS simultaneously as predictors of subclinical atherosclerosis; there have been fewer studies assessing these relationships among nonwhite populations (8,10,11). Recent reports (9,12) have suggested a differential effect of MetS by sex. The focus of this article is 1) to evaluate the association between insulin resistance (as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]) and subclinical atherosclerosis, 2) to determine whether associations of insulin resistance with subclinical atherosclerosis are independent of clinically defined MetS, and 3) to examine whether differences in these relationships exist by race/ethnicity or by sex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, there was a good correlation between the present criterion and carotid atherosclerosis in women, but in men, our results led to the judgment that inclusion of the waist circumference criterion as an essential condition is in itself of no great significance. This result is consistent with the results of the Suita cohort study and is compatible with the previous cross-sectional study that showed a sex difference in the association between carotid IMT and MetS criteria (30). Although the sex difference in the impact of the serum adiponectin level on MetS is unclear, it may be explained by the difference in its distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…[150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159] This relationship to carotid atherosclerosis is strengthened in proportion to the number of components of metabolic syndrome (p<0.001) 160-162 but appears strongest for hypertension. 152,155,156,161,163,164 Abdominal adiposity bears a graded association with the risk of stroke and TIA independent of other vascular disease risk factors. 165 Physical inactivity is a well-documented, modifiable risk factor for stroke, but the risk reduction associated with treatment is unknown.…”
Section: Risk Factor Managementmentioning
confidence: 96%