2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2007.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic syndrome and Framingham risk score for prediction of cardiovascular events in Caribbean Indian patients with blood glucose abnormalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the IDF criteria, a study found no relationship with PAD in a population of patients aged 50 to 75 years, without specification of diabetes status [22]. The same results were found in a population of Indian patients [24]. A study showed a better association for IDF criteria than for the AHA / NHLBI criteria, in contrast to our study [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the IDF criteria, a study found no relationship with PAD in a population of patients aged 50 to 75 years, without specification of diabetes status [22]. The same results were found in a population of Indian patients [24]. A study showed a better association for IDF criteria than for the AHA / NHLBI criteria, in contrast to our study [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Several studies found an association of PAD with MS according to the WHO criteria [19,20] unlike the study by Wong et al [21]. Concerning the association of PAD with MS according to NCEP-ATPIII, several studies found an association and others did not [19,22-24]. The study by Larsson et al goes in the direction of ours, especially since it is cohort study [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…MetS is a stronger predictor of diabetes while FRS appears better at predicting coronary heart disease [10]. Furthermore, MetS failed to identify subgroups at high cardiovascular risk in the short term (8.5 years), unlike the FRS, in Caribbean Indians with blood glucose abnormalities [31]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for FRS vs. the number of metabolic factors were 0.68 vs. 0.59 for CHD, 0.60 vs. 0.70 for type 2 DM and 0.66 vs. 0.55 for stroke (p<0.001 for all) 41). From another study showing whether MetS may improve identification of individuals at risk of CHD, comparison of ROC indicated that the MetS did not improve the CHD risk prediction beyond the level achieved by the FRS 39). Therefore, MetS may be used as the first line approach to treat the risk of ASCVD or diabetes.…”
Section: Framingham Risk Score Versus Metabolic Syndromementioning
confidence: 93%