A fundamental but unanswered biological question asks how much energy, on average, Earth's different life forms spend per unit mass per unit time to remain alive. Here, using the largest database to date, for 3,006 species that includes most of the range of biological diversity on the planet-from bacteria to elephants, and algae to sapling trees-we show that metabolism displays a striking degree of homeostasis across all of life. We demonstrate that, despite the enormous biochemical, physiological, and ecological differences between the surveyed species that vary over 10 20 -fold in body mass, mean metabolic rates of major taxonomic groups displayed at physiological rest converge on a narrow range from 0.3 to 9 W kg ؊1 . This 30-fold variation among life's disparate forms represents a remarkably small range compared with the 4,000-to 65,000-fold difference between the mean metabolic rates of the smallest and largest organisms that would be observed if life as a whole conformed to universal quarterpower or third-power allometric scaling laws. The observed broad convergence on a narrow range of basal metabolic rates suggests that organismal designs that fit in this physiological window have been favored by natural selection across all of life's major kingdoms, and that this range might therefore be considered as optimal for living matter as a whole.allometry ͉ body size ͉ breathing ͉ scaling ͉ energy consumption T he process of life is critically dependent on consumption of energy from the environment. The amount of energy-per unit time per unit mass-required to sustain life can rightfully be considered one of the fundamental questions in biology. Yet a general quantitative answer to this question is lacking, despite the long history and the considerable number of studies devoted to various aspects of organismal energetics in all fields of bioscience. One reason for this persistent knowledge gap is that this fundamental question is typically approached in markedly different ways depending on the organisms being investigated. We show herein how differences in types, protocols, and units of measurements of metabolism have presented a challenge to the development of quantitative generalizations regarding the metabolic rates of organisms. We then use a comprehensive dataset to reconcile such differences and to characterize the remarkable similarity that emerges from comparisons of mass-specific metabolic rates across all of life.
Problem SettingStudies of animal energetics have frequently focused on the allometric relationship between the whole-body metabolic rate Q and body mass M, Q ϭ Q 0 (M/M 0 ) b , where Q 0 is metabolic rate of an organism with body mass M 0 . Either M 0 or Q 0 can be chosen arbitrarily, whereas the second of these parameters is unambiguously defined by the choice of the first one. Usually, M 0 is chosen to be one mass unit-e.g., M 0 ϭ 1 g. For the mass-specific metabolic rate q ' Q/M, we have q ϭ q 0 (M/M 0 )  ,  ϭ b Ϫ 1, q 0 ϭ Q 0 /M 0 . Much of the current debate concerns the value of b, an...